<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Box Office Graphed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graficando los ingresos de taquilla&#160;por&#160;CINERAMA &#124; Reseñas de cine</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445998</link>
		<dc:creator>Graficando los ingresos de taquilla&#160;por&#160;CINERAMA &#124; Reseñas de cine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 05:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445998</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; /Film             RSS de los comentarios de este post. &#183; TrackBack [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | /Film             RSS de los comentarios de este post. &#183; TrackBack [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; El Box Office americano en un ilustrativo gráfico » Cinencuentro - No podemos parar de hablar de cine</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445552</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; El Box Office americano en un ilustrativo gráfico » Cinencuentro - No podemos parar de hablar de cine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 03:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445552</guid>
		<description>[...] (Vía /film) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Vía /film) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445470</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445470</guid>
		<description>New York Times graph:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/02/23/movies/20080223_REVENUE_GRAPHIC.html

Longer span of time, MUCH cooler to look at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times graph:<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/02/23/movies/20080223_REVENUE_GRAPHIC.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/02/23/movies/20080223_REVENUE_GRAPHIC.html</a></p>
<p>Longer span of time, MUCH cooler to look at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445463</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445463</guid>
		<description>At the end of the year, someone should do a Wordle map of all the highest grossing movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the year, someone should do a Wordle map of all the highest grossing movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kode</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445419</link>
		<dc:creator>Kode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445419</guid>
		<description>ouuchh, Hellboy didn't deserved that lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ouuchh, Hellboy didn&#8217;t deserved that lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445410</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445410</guid>
		<description>@ Andy
the height of where something is, isn't important its the thickness of the band over that week...so Iron man's thickness is much wider than Hulk, i.e. Iron man is bigger...the reason it looks that way is because they're all stacked...really the height demonstrates the weekend box office...so the more money a WEEKEND (not a movie) made...the higher the up the chart it rises</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Andy<br />
the height of where something is, isn&#8217;t important its the thickness of the band over that week&#8230;so Iron man&#8217;s thickness is much wider than Hulk, i.e. Iron man is bigger&#8230;the reason it looks that way is because they&#8217;re all stacked&#8230;really the height demonstrates the weekend box office&#8230;so the more money a WEEKEND (not a movie) made&#8230;the higher the up the chart it rises</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445405</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445405</guid>
		<description>@ Andy
the height of where something is, isn't important its the thickness of the band over that week...so Iron man's thickness is much wider than Hulk, i.e. Iron man is bigger...the reason it looks that way is because they're all stacked...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Andy<br />
the height of where something is, isn&#8217;t important its the thickness of the band over that week&#8230;so Iron man&#8217;s thickness is much wider than Hulk, i.e. Iron man is bigger&#8230;the reason it looks that way is because they&#8217;re all stacked&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerris Beutler's Day On</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerris Beutler's Day On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445393</guid>
		<description>And lol at the person who said Speed Racer was a hit in the Wolfman post. Idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And lol at the person who said Speed Racer was a hit in the Wolfman post. Idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerris Beutler's Day On</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445386</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerris Beutler's Day On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445386</guid>
		<description>Hahah......Sex in the City did better than Cloverfield. 


Ahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahah&#8230;&#8230;Sex in the City did better than Cloverfield. </p>
<p>Ahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445374</link>
		<dc:creator>hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445374</guid>
		<description>hooray for colorful graphs...this site is one step closer to becoming USA Today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hooray for colorful graphs&#8230;this site is one step closer to becoming USA Today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anomaly</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445371</link>
		<dc:creator>Anomaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445371</guid>
		<description>I remember the New York Times did something similar to this on their website, but instead it spanned from I believe the early 80s all the way to the end of 2007, and everything was shown curved, rather than as blocks in weeks. It was interesting to see how blockbusters grew and grew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the New York Times did something similar to this on their website, but instead it spanned from I believe the early 80s all the way to the end of 2007, and everything was shown curved, rather than as blocks in weeks. It was interesting to see how blockbusters grew and grew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445362</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445362</guid>
		<description>That's pretty awesome to look at</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty awesome to look at</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445360</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445360</guid>
		<description>LOL @ The Love Guru!!!

I love this chart, I whish I could make this with Excel at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL @ The Love Guru!!!</p>
<p>I love this chart, I whish I could make this with Excel at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445349</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445349</guid>
		<description>You're missing that Incredible Hulk is actually way above Iron Man - i was surprised by that. The reason Iron Man stands out is because there ae less high grossing movies at the same time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re missing that Incredible Hulk is actually way above Iron Man - i was surprised by that. The reason Iron Man stands out is because there ae less high grossing movies at the same time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445345</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445345</guid>
		<description>Very cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steelo</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445344</link>
		<dc:creator>Steelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445344</guid>
		<description>that's pretty damn fresh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s pretty damn fresh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Phoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445343</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445343</guid>
		<description>BRILLIANT&#62;.. takes a second to adjust to .. but very cool. Would be good wall art.. infact.. that very well be my next project.. Cheery O to yall at Xach.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRILLIANT&gt;.. takes a second to adjust to .. but very cool. Would be good wall art.. infact.. that very well be my next project.. Cheery O to yall at Xach.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445338</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445338</guid>
		<description>i lol @ how big the dark night section is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i lol @ how big the dark night section is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445331</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445331</guid>
		<description>That is brillant to look at, makes your eyes go funny and I got lost in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is brillant to look at, makes your eyes go funny and I got lost in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Bart-O</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/01/2008-box-office-graphed/#comment-445329</link>
		<dc:creator>El Bart-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/?p=13777#comment-445329</guid>
		<description>yeah i'd rather stick to the box office list on yahoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i&#8217;d rather stick to the box office list on yahoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
