Comments on: Cloverfield 2 Will Not Be a “Literal Sequel”

By: King of the Rodeo

King of the Rodeo — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:18:53 +0000

I agree with milo and 790.
this film was great if Abrams does make a second they're gonna wait for the hype of "C2" to die down then release a few teaser trailers like the first

By: The Kaleb

The Kaleb — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:32:36 +0000

I agree with Kevin.
I think I heard something about Cloverfield 2 being the same attack, but from another point of view.

By: KingOfPain

KingOfPain — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 08:59:51 +0000

There is only one guy who can kill that Cloverfield beast and his name is Stephen Siegel…Lol I can see him just killing the damn thing with a karate chop or one of his famous neck snapz. I love this movie

By: Brian

Brian — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:08:17 +0000

My Fiance’ and I are feeling the same way as alot of others are saying. We should have it filmed in the eyes of the military, so we can go in depth into what the military can see as to where it comes from, and also if it died or not. Like a helmet cam off of one of the troops, who lives of course, but he would be in a helicopter in the air when the bombing raids happen at the end. At the end of the credits you can hear them saying its still alive, so the sequel could probably be a continuation of the original, and have it be from the military too.

By: ben

ben — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:54:21 +0000

its chuck norris for christ sake

By: billy

billy — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:57:31 +0000

i really liked this movie i think they should do the same way of shooting from like a news reporter or army guy but i would watch it during the same setting but i would like to see it after new york been destroyed and it moves to somewhere else or whatever but i want to see a sequel

By: 790

790 — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:22:50 +0000

I might have issues Mike, but there not from Cloverfield. Lol.

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:56:53 +0000

For those that said this movie gave you a headache or dizzy, you have issues. I saw the movie with my wife, who is extremely sensitive to motion sickness, and she had no issue with it at all. In fact, most of the people I spoke to say dizziness or becoming sick wasn’t an issue at all.

That said, I really hope they make a sequel. The first one was one of the best movies I’ve seen in a long time.

By: Shari B

Shari B — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:50:00 +0000

Loved the first one. Bought the DVD. The theater gave me a headache but on our 32 inch tv I had no problem and seemed to give the illusion of less movement and we could tell more of what was actually going on. Can’t wait for a sequel. Like the idea of the brother not really being dead, just fell in the river. Also military finding the 2 in Central Park severely hurt but alive. And if Clover is just a baby then let’s see mama. Kind of reminds me of the old film I loved as a kid ‘Gorgo”.

By: goobeedeeglop

goobeedeeglop — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:39:47 +0000

i loved cloverfield

By: adam v

adam v — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:31:13 +0000

GUH - if you dont care why bother going to the effort of reading the article then commenting you idiot haters like you drive me nuts get a life.

By: Matt H

Matt H — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:11:06 +0000

In my view, Abrams set this up to be a trilogy:

1st movie–POV collateral damage (the random and innocent victims) w/ little info on what’s actually causing this
2nd Movie–POV US Military and a lot more info on what’s actually causing this
3rd Movie–POV Government (full cinematic style) and the ultimate reveal behind all of this.

All movies cover the same general time period with each successor going a few hours in time past it’s predecessor.

Just my thoughts, and if it were done that’s how I’d like to see it.

By: SoldierOfFortune

SoldierOfFortune — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:27:07 +0000

I’ve been a Cloverfield nut since I first saw the trailer. Since then, I’ve browsed the Wed quite a bit and have heard various rumors about new plotlines. Still, I think the sequel should be done in the same style as the previous one but perhaps in a new local. Europe would be cool, (Britain or France) or maybe Asia (Shanghai or Tokyo).

By: bill

bill — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:17:25 +0000

ok i saw the movie with my friend and by the time the movie ended, we could not walk straight. thats how dizzy it made us. i really hope they dont do another handheld camera thing in the sequel like they did in the first one.

By: beto

beto — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:44:10 +0000

i think the sequel would be great. Cloverfield reminds me of games like Half Life. Example: Antlions - Parasites and the first person. and im not sure but in one part a guy hits a parasite with a Crowbar!

Sorry for my English

By: is...

is... — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:16:42 +0000

one military cam,one civil cam…2 monster…just like that.

By: maybe

maybe — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:34:43 +0000

being that no weapons seemed to have harmed it and it is pretty over the top sci-fi already, cloverfield would have been a good lead into a voltron movie. since voltron was created to fight giant monsters .

By: 2008 Comic-con news wrap up! : This Is Some Scene

2008 Comic-con news wrap up! : This Is Some Scene — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:40:58 +0000

[...] was asked about the sequel to CLOVERFIELD. He of course was very guarded about the whole thing but /Film heard him say, “There’s something we’re playing with now that may or may not happen. [...]

By: Noticias: J.J. Abrams lo intentará de nuevo en la secuela de Cloverfield - Extracine

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:03:47 +0000

[...] Vía: Cloverfield 2 Will Not Be a “Literal Sequel” [...]

By: Noticias GL » Habrá secuela de Cloverfield, pero no será "literal"

Noticias GL » Habrá secuela de Cloverfield, pero no será "literal" — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:30:03 +0000

[...] Via | /Film [...]