Comments on: First Look: Tom Hanks in Angels & Demons

By: Antonio

Antonio — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:34:23 +0000

I loved the first book it was great, the movie is what mad it so bad for me it really was not fun or exciting the back ground music did not even draw me in. Bu i love the second novel and i only hope they make this movie good and exciting its possible with the events that go on.

By: Jerry Gerovac

Jerry Gerovac — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:28:02 +0000

I saw and read the Da Vinci Code. OK book. Then I read Angels and Demons—much, much better read. The movie should prove an even better story. I disagree with anyone who says A & D is not the Da Vinci Code……..it isn’t BUT it was a much more interesting book.

The movie should prove this….I hope!!!

By: The Daily Dose Of Information

The Daily Dose Of Information — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:38:37 +0000

[...] up is a first look at “Angels and Demons”. Well, the Da Vinci Code was a box office hit (though it got negative reviews)… I am [...]

By: Moco

Moco — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:19:21 +0000

What Van Gogh is doing in the second picture?

By: Dan

Dan — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:35:52 +0000

Your story has a typo. It says they are NOT filming in Rome. I think you meant “now” instead of “not”.

By: Angela

Angela — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:29:52 +0000

DEFINATELY found angels and demons more interesting.

By: Ziggy

Ziggy — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:20:46 +0000

Tom Hanks’ only sequel? You call yourselves movie buffs? Haven’t you seen Joe vs. the Volcano 2??? Pure cinematic genius.

By: Barry

Barry — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:19:54 +0000

Could not agree more about Angels & Demons being a better book, so much more tense and enthralling.

By: linkmingle.com

linkmingle.com — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:13:21 +0000

A&D is a far more thrilling story and has a great climax, which was non esistant in Da Vinci code. DC movie was a slow paced even though the book was more thrilling

By: Johnny Tripwwire

Johnny Tripwwire — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:57:21 +0000

Wow, its gonna be good. I dont recall Tom Hanks ever making a bad movie.

By: THA DUKE OF SALTY SNAX

THA DUKE OF SALTY SNAX — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:49:07 +0000

I always thought John Lithgow would have made a better choice for the lead character…

By: TELEVISION SPY

TELEVISION SPY — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:00:24 +0000

Run Forrest Run..err Run Hanks Run!

By: jim janes

jim janes — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:20:40 +0000

the davinci code was a completely unwatchable movie imo, i’ve tried to watch it a couple times on a freaking airplane for gods sakes and gotten bored

By: The Jezzus

The Jezzus — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:04:40 +0000

Angels and Demons was a great book. The ending was a bit over reality but it was still fun to read!

By: sari

sari — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:38:39 +0000

Forget this. They should make a movie out of The Phantom Tollbooth. That would rule all.

By: jfive

jfive — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:14:00 +0000

The second book was better but will the second movie be better then the first? Ron Howard rarely disapoints so im willing to give him a second chance. lol @ at the Tom Hanks hair comments that horrid mop he called hair was defiantly one of the most irritating things of the movie.

By: Thumb

Thumb — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:58:29 +0000

Praise the lord! It looks like Hanks has finally admitted defeat in the bad hair war he’s been conducting with Nic Cage.

I wonder when Nic will be notified of the ceasefire.

By: Chump Force 1

Chump Force 1 — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:57:28 +0000

His hair is shorter so it must be better the Da Vinci.

By: Rob

Rob — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:47:31 +0000

i feel like it should be noted that this is tom hank’s first ever sequel (apart from toy story).

By: Frank

Frank — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:47:10 +0000

Angels & Demons might be a more interesting read, but its ending is absolutely ridiculous. I basically read the book in just 2 or 3 days and was so disappointed after I had finished.
And that respect, the 2nd novel was definitely better.