<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paramount Wants Star Trek Sequel; Transformers 2 to be Self Contained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  1 Dec 2008 18:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JJ Abrams’ Enterprise Feels Fully Functional &#124; cinematvnews.com</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-401509</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ Abrams’ Enterprise Feels Fully Functional &#124; cinematvnews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-401509</guid>
		<description>[...] Paramount Wants Star Trek Sequel; Transformers 2 to be Self Contained [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paramount Wants Star Trek Sequel; Transformers 2 to be Self Contained [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-366350</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-366350</guid>
		<description>Star Trek is going to need Iron Man numbers to really get off the ground.  
If JJ Abhrams screws it up for the hardcore, there won't be enough buzz to make this a blockbuster.  
(IMO). This is the biggest movie gamble in years. 

Its going to be interesting, we have 2 franchises that could (nuke the fridge) in the same month.  
Star Trek and Terminator. 

Transformers, I couldn't care less.  The first one was crap and I'm not even going to bother with this sequel.  If jon voight is in it I won't even watch it on dvd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek is going to need Iron Man numbers to really get off the ground.<br />
If JJ Abhrams screws it up for the hardcore, there won&#8217;t be enough buzz to make this a blockbuster.<br />
(IMO). This is the biggest movie gamble in years. </p>
<p>Its going to be interesting, we have 2 franchises that could (nuke the fridge) in the same month.<br />
Star Trek and Terminator. </p>
<p>Transformers, I couldn&#8217;t care less.  The first one was crap and I&#8217;m not even going to bother with this sequel.  If jon voight is in it I won&#8217;t even watch it on dvd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-366112</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-366112</guid>
		<description>i hate sequel titles that go on and on......

Transformers 2 : The Decepiticons look for revenge and now it's personal

Indy 4's title went on and on and on............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate sequel titles that go on and on&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Transformers 2 : The Decepiticons look for revenge and now it&#8217;s personal</p>
<p>Indy 4&#8217;s title went on and on and on&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-366066</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-366066</guid>
		<description>By "we go with a lot of different levels" Bay means he's gonna have explosions on the ground and explosions in the sky. He might even throw in some underwater explosions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By &#8220;we go with a lot of different levels&#8221; Bay means he&#8217;s gonna have explosions on the ground and explosions in the sky. He might even throw in some underwater explosions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-365790</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-365790</guid>
		<description>I hope they do a Beast Wars movie,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they do a Beast Wars movie,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sari</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-365769</link>
		<dc:creator>sari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-365769</guid>
		<description>As long as they don't call it "Star Trek 2." I hate sequels that are called "Something Something 2." I mean seriously "Transformers 2" on that poster above looks so weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as they don&#8217;t call it &#8220;Star Trek 2.&#8221; I hate sequels that are called &#8220;Something Something 2.&#8221; I mean seriously &#8220;Transformers 2&#8243; on that poster above looks so weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Enchanted One</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-365510</link>
		<dc:creator>The Enchanted One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/05/paramount-wants-star-trek-sequel-transformers-2-to-be-self-contained/#comment-365510</guid>
		<description>JJ Abrams is going to be busy in the next few years. Star Trek sequel, Dark Tower, Cloverfield 2 (maybe) and many other projects. Busy guy indeed.

Transformers 2, hopefully will be better than the first but with Bay written the script....idk. But i expect more action and big explosions. He's known for that you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ Abrams is going to be busy in the next few years. Star Trek sequel, Dark Tower, Cloverfield 2 (maybe) and many other projects. Busy guy indeed.</p>
<p>Transformers 2, hopefully will be better than the first but with Bay written the script&#8230;.idk. But i expect more action and big explosions. He&#8217;s known for that you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
