<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McG Denies T4 Ending Spoiler; Apologizes For His Ridiculous Nickname</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-365217</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-365217</guid>
		<description>I really don't have a problem with McG, his credits read like a list of things not to see but whatever. 

Problem I have is the parts where Marcus is a T_800 from Project Angel back in 2004. 
 Ripping off Connors skin and putting it on an endo to keep up morale in the resistance ranks.   
(Those bother me like a daggers in my eyes.)  

As we move closer to the release date these details will ether be confirmed or debunked.  Rest assured if these details turn out to be true,,,, o boy, the fans are going to demand their money back, and there prob won't be a sequel. McG and possibly even Bale will become hated throughout the land. 

 What scares me now is read the title again. 
Terminator Salvation , the future begins.  
 
I can read between the lines and it all points to a Terminator Connor.  

McG needs to stop dwelling on his name and ratings and come clean on this rumor! 
 
As Sarah Connor would say:
 "you know what I believe in, your allready dead Silberman! So don't fuck with me!". 

Open the door Mcg!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t have a problem with McG, his credits read like a list of things not to see but whatever. </p>
<p>Problem I have is the parts where Marcus is a T_800 from Project Angel back in 2004.<br />
 Ripping off Connors skin and putting it on an endo to keep up morale in the resistance ranks.<br />
(Those bother me like a daggers in my eyes.)  </p>
<p>As we move closer to the release date these details will ether be confirmed or debunked.  Rest assured if these details turn out to be true,,,, o boy, the fans are going to demand their money back, and there prob won&#8217;t be a sequel. McG and possibly even Bale will become hated throughout the land. </p>
<p> What scares me now is read the title again.<br />
Terminator Salvation , the future begins.  </p>
<p>I can read between the lines and it all points to a Terminator Connor.  </p>
<p>McG needs to stop dwelling on his name and ratings and come clean on this rumor! </p>
<p>As Sarah Connor would say:<br />
 &#8220;you know what I believe in, your allready dead Silberman! So don&#8217;t fuck with me!&#8221;. </p>
<p>Open the door Mcg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmoney</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-365196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-365196</guid>
		<description>ok, i get that this guy isn't the first choice for Terminator, but we could give him a chance. Chuck is actually a pretty funny show, and Supernatural has had a good run, so someone must like it. the Charlie's Angels movies werent great but they had a lot of action, he didnt write them, he cant be blamed for a bad script. and who knows, maybe the OC would have been worse without him, maybe he was the one who injected the Sandy/Seth comedy, maybe without him it would have just been 90210. i mean the guy directed documentaries on Sublime and Cypress Hill, so he can't be all bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, i get that this guy isn&#8217;t the first choice for Terminator, but we could give him a chance. Chuck is actually a pretty funny show, and Supernatural has had a good run, so someone must like it. the Charlie&#8217;s Angels movies werent great but they had a lot of action, he didnt write them, he cant be blamed for a bad script. and who knows, maybe the OC would have been worse without him, maybe he was the one who injected the Sandy/Seth comedy, maybe without him it would have just been 90210. i mean the guy directed documentaries on Sublime and Cypress Hill, so he can&#8217;t be all bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-364844</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-364844</guid>
		<description>lol @ gocitizen's post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol @ gocitizen&#8217;s post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gocitizen</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-364009</link>
		<dc:creator>gocitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-364009</guid>
		<description>i've already come to terms that this will be something I will someday watch on TBS or Spike and be doubly pissed because I have to deal with the endless commercials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve already come to terms that this will be something I will someday watch on TBS or Spike and be doubly pissed because I have to deal with the endless commercials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363837</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363837</guid>
		<description>Arnold bled in the first three Terminators. I assumed it was a disguise  until you saw him in full form.

I don't know what to think of the Terminator: Salvation series. If its full of unnecessary CGI that became of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull than I'm totally tuned out.

If McG wants to talk Batman Begins than I think he should disguise the effects like that movie. The story and characters are first not a random digital alien.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arnold bled in the first three Terminators. I assumed it was a disguise  until you saw him in full form.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what to think of the Terminator: Salvation series. If its full of unnecessary CGI that became of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull than I&#8217;m totally tuned out.</p>
<p>If McG wants to talk Batman Begins than I think he should disguise the effects like that movie. The story and characters are first not a random digital alien.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkyNet</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363791</link>
		<dc:creator>SkyNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363791</guid>
		<description>McG...........I'm watching you................SkyNet&#62;







copyrite microsoft 2029</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McG&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..I&#8217;m watching you&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.SkyNet&gt;</p>
<p>copyrite microsoft 2029</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363779</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363779</guid>
		<description>Captain Awesome, I feel like your the only one that gets me on this site. 
You crack me up bro!
 And yes I think your right. What a mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captain Awesome, I feel like your the only one that gets me on this site.<br />
You crack me up bro!<br />
 And yes I think your right. What a mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363772</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363772</guid>
		<description>790 with the detailed Terminator mythos 3 footer.

This MCG dude is going to furthur bury this franchise. I don't care who or what the cast is. I really don't understand why people seem to think this guy is going to all of a sudden have some "artistic renaissance awakening" now that he's got his hands on a franchise that's be turned into a WWF weekend special.

The guys been making crap for years, this isn't going to change anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>790 with the detailed Terminator mythos 3 footer.</p>
<p>This MCG dude is going to furthur bury this franchise. I don&#8217;t care who or what the cast is. I really don&#8217;t understand why people seem to think this guy is going to all of a sudden have some &#8220;artistic renaissance awakening&#8221; now that he&#8217;s got his hands on a franchise that&#8217;s be turned into a WWF weekend special.</p>
<p>The guys been making crap for years, this isn&#8217;t going to change anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363692</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363692</guid>
		<description>First off I don't even think McG wrote that. 
 This sounds like damage control at Skynet central. 

 Mcg? touched on 3 main points:  here's the problems I have with them.  
 
The T-600.
 He described as a "8ft tall, killing machine that roams the land killing anything with a heartbeat". 
 If you go watch T1, Reese describes the T-600 and T-800's as infiltration units. They are the "steath models" of there day.
 They don't roam the landscape shooting rabbits. 
 The T-600's weren't described as being 8ft tall.  (Only having rubber skin.)
  If you get what Reese was saying, the T-600's were prototype models.  Models that were used as test runs for the elite T-800 models.  
(So whoevers writing this there allready pissing me off.)  

Then McG talks about the PG-13 rating.  
 Ok the rating bothers me but thats not what everyones talking about here today. 
(We can deal with that after this plot problem.) 

Then we get a empathy speech about his so-called name.  
 (Who cares!  I'm concerned about the plot details not what you call yourself.) 

 Hear me now McG/whoevers writing this rebute, if Marcus is a T-anything, or Connor's dead corpes is skinned and thrown on the Endoskeleton of Marcus as a (role model?), then buddy you just shit on 80% of the Terminator fanbase.

This isn't the Sarah Connor Cronicles man!
 Just because it did well (only thing on during a WGA strike) on TV dosnt mean that shits gonna fly with the film fanbase.  
 This sounds like a bad TV show idea, and a pathetic way to milk the fans.

 If this really is McG, your completly out of touch bro!  
And this film is going to be more like Judgement Day than you think, if you catch my fallout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off I don&#8217;t even think McG wrote that.<br />
 This sounds like damage control at Skynet central. </p>
<p> Mcg? touched on 3 main points:  here&#8217;s the problems I have with them.  </p>
<p>The T-600.<br />
 He described as a &#8220;8ft tall, killing machine that roams the land killing anything with a heartbeat&#8221;.<br />
 If you go watch T1, Reese describes the T-600 and T-800&#8217;s as infiltration units. They are the &#8220;steath models&#8221; of there day.<br />
 They don&#8217;t roam the landscape shooting rabbits.<br />
 The T-600&#8217;s weren&#8217;t described as being 8ft tall.  (Only having rubber skin.)<br />
  If you get what Reese was saying, the T-600&#8217;s were prototype models.  Models that were used as test runs for the elite T-800 models.<br />
(So whoevers writing this there allready pissing me off.)  </p>
<p>Then McG talks about the PG-13 rating.<br />
 Ok the rating bothers me but thats not what everyones talking about here today.<br />
(We can deal with that after this plot problem.) </p>
<p>Then we get a empathy speech about his so-called name.<br />
 (Who cares!  I&#8217;m concerned about the plot details not what you call yourself.) </p>
<p> Hear me now McG/whoevers writing this rebute, if Marcus is a T-anything, or Connor&#8217;s dead corpes is skinned and thrown on the Endoskeleton of Marcus as a (role model?), then buddy you just shit on 80% of the Terminator fanbase.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the Sarah Connor Cronicles man!<br />
 Just because it did well (only thing on during a WGA strike) on TV dosnt mean that shits gonna fly with the film fanbase.<br />
 This sounds like a bad TV show idea, and a pathetic way to milk the fans.</p>
<p> If this really is McG, your completly out of touch bro!<br />
And this film is going to be more like Judgement Day than you think, if you catch my fallout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOTNorm</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363616</link>
		<dc:creator>LOTNorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363616</guid>
		<description>Being someone given a nickname I'm still trying to get rid of, I can relate to McG... but I agree that he doesn't have to be credited as "McG". He may have been given it young, but he keeps it cause it's recognizable. Even when all he's made are mediocre films, we recognize his name. Could I say that same if he was "Joseph Nichol"? Who knows, I recognize "Uwe Boll"... though that could be an exception which proves the rule...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being someone given a nickname I&#8217;m still trying to get rid of, I can relate to McG&#8230; but I agree that he doesn&#8217;t have to be credited as &#8220;McG&#8221;. He may have been given it young, but he keeps it cause it&#8217;s recognizable. Even when all he&#8217;s made are mediocre films, we recognize his name. Could I say that same if he was &#8220;Joseph Nichol&#8221;? Who knows, I recognize &#8220;Uwe Boll&#8221;&#8230; though that could be an exception which proves the rule&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orange cinema</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363594</link>
		<dc:creator>orange cinema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363594</guid>
		<description>-dammit, this guy actually sounds pretty cool.  and i have a grandpa joe who is the kindest man i'll ever know.  i'm officially backing off of the 'mcg personal bashing'. 

-i'd like to see an R rating, after all, THIS IS A FILM ABOUT THE GENOCIDE OF THE HUMAN RACE.  but i also don't want to see random violence just for the sake of an R.  STORY STORY STORY - that is all i care about.  well, story and execution.  

-i just don't like the idea of ticket sales being more important than a brutality honest vision of what this would be like: "eight-foot tall killers that prowl the badlands looking for anything with a heartbeat to terminate.â€  can you depict that in pg-13 - yes.  can you HONESTLY depict that in pg-13 - not in the established terminator universe.

-those non-human looking robots will be 100 times creepier if they use practical effects and not cg.  it could be very creepy, just not when you can tell its cgi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-dammit, this guy actually sounds pretty cool.  and i have a grandpa joe who is the kindest man i&#8217;ll ever know.  i&#8217;m officially backing off of the &#8216;mcg personal bashing&#8217;. </p>
<p>-i&#8217;d like to see an R rating, after all, THIS IS A FILM ABOUT THE GENOCIDE OF THE HUMAN RACE.  but i also don&#8217;t want to see random violence just for the sake of an R.  STORY STORY STORY - that is all i care about.  well, story and execution.  </p>
<p>-i just don&#8217;t like the idea of ticket sales being more important than a brutality honest vision of what this would be like: &#8220;eight-foot tall killers that prowl the badlands looking for anything with a heartbeat to terminate.â€  can you depict that in pg-13 - yes.  can you HONESTLY depict that in pg-13 - not in the established terminator universe.</p>
<p>-those non-human looking robots will be 100 times creepier if they use practical effects and not cg.  it could be very creepy, just not when you can tell its cgi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Webzine! &#187; Archives blogue &#187; La rÃ©demption de McG</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363520</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Webzine! &#187; Archives blogue &#187; La rÃ©demption de McG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363520</guid>
		<description>[...] : /Film    These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : /Film    These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SUe</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363507</link>
		<dc:creator>SUe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363507</guid>
		<description>People get called all sorts of nicknames, it doesn't mean you need to get credited as them.  It's not like the director of 3 Kings goes by Douchebag O. Russell because everyone calls him that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People get called all sorts of nicknames, it doesn&#8217;t mean you need to get credited as them.  It&#8217;s not like the director of 3 Kings goes by Douchebag O. Russell because everyone calls him that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363493</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363493</guid>
		<description>He probably keeps the McG to associate himself with Hip-Hop culture, in hopes that young kids who don't know any better will go see his garbage films bec ause they think he's a rapper or something. It's a lame nickname, period. Anyway if he thinks the crap he's catching now for his name, and the crappy Charlie's Angle's movies is bad, wait to see what will happen if he screws up the Terminator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He probably keeps the McG to associate himself with Hip-Hop culture, in hopes that young kids who don&#8217;t know any better will go see his garbage films bec ause they think he&#8217;s a rapper or something. It&#8217;s a lame nickname, period. Anyway if he thinks the crap he&#8217;s catching now for his name, and the crappy Charlie&#8217;s Angle&#8217;s movies is bad, wait to see what will happen if he screws up the Terminator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363492</guid>
		<description>Wah Wah Wah. People complain about PG-13. Theres been plenty of PG13 movies that have been good. Since most of the terminators (it seems) will not have "skin" then it shouldn't be rated R. Thats the only real reason The first terminator was rated R. Just because a movie isnt rated R, doesnt mean it can't be good. He said, "The movie comes first and it will be protected at all timesâ€¦" Seems pretty legit to me. Im sure if it comes out with an R rating, they're not going to scrap it. They will probably just cut down on useless "HEY LETS PUT SOME RANDOM BLOOD SPLATTER THAT IS COMPLETELY UNNEEDED RIGHT THERE!" I cant believe there are people that are going to complain about a movies RATING.. Very mature..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wah Wah Wah. People complain about PG-13. Theres been plenty of PG13 movies that have been good. Since most of the terminators (it seems) will not have &#8220;skin&#8221; then it shouldn&#8217;t be rated R. Thats the only real reason The first terminator was rated R. Just because a movie isnt rated R, doesnt mean it can&#8217;t be good. He said, &#8220;The movie comes first and it will be protected at all timesâ€¦&#8221; Seems pretty legit to me. Im sure if it comes out with an R rating, they&#8217;re not going to scrap it. They will probably just cut down on useless &#8220;HEY LETS PUT SOME RANDOM BLOOD SPLATTER THAT IS COMPLETELY UNNEEDED RIGHT THERE!&#8221; I cant believe there are people that are going to complain about a movies RATING.. Very mature..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyMafia's Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363487</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyMafia's Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363487</guid>
		<description>@MonkeyMafia: What the hell are you doing to my Roomba?? Stop it now or you'll go blind...or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MonkeyMafia: What the hell are you doing to my Roomba?? Stop it now or you&#8217;ll go blind&#8230;or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363399</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363399</guid>
		<description>"PG-13 future war", still cracks me up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;PG-13 future war&#8221;, still cracks me up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Stephenson</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363299</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Stephenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363299</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me? Hahaha.

Carrot Top, Sting, Vanilla Ice, Snow, Bono, and McG belong to the Skull &#38; Bones of AsinineLand. Tarsem is still awaiting membership. Prince is exempted, b/c his goes up to 11. 

Join the adults, McG. You have a McName. Ditch it. 

As for his comparison to Batman Begins, zzzzz. We'll be hearing this from every director for the next decade. Terminators are killing machines, dystopias works best when they are R. 

Would Blade Runner, Aliens or Total Recall be better rated PG-13? They still couldn't pass for PG-13 today. 

Don't Aliens bleed acid per that defense of Terminator 4? A PG-13 Alien movie, really? A new trilogy of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? Hahaha.</p>
<p>Carrot Top, Sting, Vanilla Ice, Snow, Bono, and McG belong to the Skull &amp; Bones of AsinineLand. Tarsem is still awaiting membership. Prince is exempted, b/c his goes up to 11. </p>
<p>Join the adults, McG. You have a McName. Ditch it. </p>
<p>As for his comparison to Batman Begins, zzzzz. We&#8217;ll be hearing this from every director for the next decade. Terminators are killing machines, dystopias works best when they are R. </p>
<p>Would Blade Runner, Aliens or Total Recall be better rated PG-13? They still couldn&#8217;t pass for PG-13 today. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t Aliens bleed acid per that defense of Terminator 4? A PG-13 Alien movie, really? A new trilogy of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phontsolo</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363296</link>
		<dc:creator>Phontsolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363296</guid>
		<description>I just found out this guy directed both Charlie's Angels and produced The Pussycat Dolls Present: The Search for the Next Doll. Why would anyone pick this guy to direct such a HUGE franchise like the Terminator? Smells like some one doing some one else a favor. 

To me, this sounds like the wrong choice for Terminator. I don't know about this one people. 

But. Regardless, i guess good directors need to start some where. I hope he starts here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found out this guy directed both Charlie&#8217;s Angels and produced The Pussycat Dolls Present: The Search for the Next Doll. Why would anyone pick this guy to direct such a HUGE franchise like the Terminator? Smells like some one doing some one else a favor. </p>
<p>To me, this sounds like the wrong choice for Terminator. I don&#8217;t know about this one people. </p>
<p>But. Regardless, i guess good directors need to start some where. I hope he starts here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmoney</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363282</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/06/03/mcg-denies-t4-spoilers-apologizes-for-ridiculous-name/#comment-363282</guid>
		<description>i doubt his high school diploma says McG. at the very least he could put McG Nichol. not having a last name is what makes this retarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i doubt his high school diploma says McG. at the very least he could put McG Nichol. not having a last name is what makes this retarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
