<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indiana Jones 4 - What did You Think??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  3 Dec 2008 22:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352692</link>
		<dc:creator>J Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352692</guid>
		<description>This was a fantastic return to form. A brilliant, fun, exciting and completely engrossing adventure. What is wrong with these haters?!?! How are aliens any different from mystical crates or magical cups? There is no law written that states Indy films are only allowed to explore Judeo-Christian themes and for that matter, Judeo-Christian artifacts. The Nazis wanted to use supernatural powers harnessed from the Ark for world domination in the first film. HOW IS THIS SO DIFFERENT FROM THE NEW FILM?!?! Besides, the Mayan culture is full of theories that suggest alien influence. 

People are amazing. Why even go if you know you're going to hate it? As someone posted, "soul raping thunder slaughter of shit" ...are you kidding me? Really. Are you kidding? Way to miss the point entirely. Really. Way to miss the point. Wow. Sad. Crystal Skull is the most fun I've had at the movies in years. Bravo, Spielberg, Lucas and Ford (and Allen). Bravo. Saw it twice in 48 hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a fantastic return to form. A brilliant, fun, exciting and completely engrossing adventure. What is wrong with these haters?!?! How are aliens any different from mystical crates or magical cups? There is no law written that states Indy films are only allowed to explore Judeo-Christian themes and for that matter, Judeo-Christian artifacts. The Nazis wanted to use supernatural powers harnessed from the Ark for world domination in the first film. HOW IS THIS SO DIFFERENT FROM THE NEW FILM?!?! Besides, the Mayan culture is full of theories that suggest alien influence. </p>
<p>People are amazing. Why even go if you know you&#8217;re going to hate it? As someone posted, &#8220;soul raping thunder slaughter of shit&#8221; &#8230;are you kidding me? Really. Are you kidding? Way to miss the point entirely. Really. Way to miss the point. Wow. Sad. Crystal Skull is the most fun I&#8217;ve had at the movies in years. Bravo, Spielberg, Lucas and Ford (and Allen). Bravo. Saw it twice in 48 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davenix</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352559</link>
		<dc:creator>davenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352559</guid>
		<description>I would have never thought a Goonies sequel could be so good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have never thought a Goonies sequel could be so good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyMango</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352474</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyMango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352474</guid>
		<description>Watched the movie tonight, even went with a very low expectation, I left the cinema somewhat disappointed for the following reasons: This movie is forgettable, there are some plot issues that doesnâ€™t separate well from one to another, and they do not connect well either, everything is like one big blur, so if all the actors and actresses did well, then whoâ€™s fault is it? This is definitely NOT the best in the series, but the part with punching each other in the face between the Russian soldier and Indiana Jones over a very long period of time (no less than 3 minutes but felt like a next to forever 5 minutes) is definitely a problem. The problem: EDITING. I enjoyed the warehouse scene, as we all have been wondering what is with the warehouse since the original movie in the 1970â€™s, but wouldnâ€™t everyone else have done more than just seeking the one single item in mind specially when you were told that this is the warehouse of the US secrets? Thatâ€™s just too much of a one track mind with me. The entrance of Karen Allen was just simply did her wrong, no matter how much I like her character and her acting, and her as a person. She came out from the tent and there she was, is that it? I can open my mind and accept the sword fight and the jungle chase, and all those other easy to predict things leading to the inside of the tomb with 13 sets of alien skeletons with one skull missing, but what pissed me off the most is the scene when the flying saucer was taking off, Indiana Jones didnâ€™t even bother to duck behind the large stone to his left when derbies was flying everywhere, totally unlike the original movie at the lost ark opening scene, â€œNo matter what happens, donâ€™t open your eyesâ€, which created the emotion that perhaps we should close ours either but of course we kept ours opened anyway. The ending is too convenient, Indiana Jones was getting married with no incident, and a too simple of a setup for Shia LaBeouf to be the next Indiana Jones, but yet didnâ€™t even bother to leave us a sense of hope nor any reason to hope that he would even be better than the Harrison Ford Indiana Jones character, so if that is the case, why even bother to set him up and screw up the ending to begin with? Is Steven Spielberg loosing his creative mind and all he cares is to CASH IN on 30 years old previous accomplishments?

To Steven Spielberg: have you seen any of the BOURNE movies? You seem very out of touch with the today audience. You might want to consider stopping your CASH IN method on your 30 years old previous accomplishments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched the movie tonight, even went with a very low expectation, I left the cinema somewhat disappointed for the following reasons: This movie is forgettable, there are some plot issues that doesnâ€™t separate well from one to another, and they do not connect well either, everything is like one big blur, so if all the actors and actresses did well, then whoâ€™s fault is it? This is definitely NOT the best in the series, but the part with punching each other in the face between the Russian soldier and Indiana Jones over a very long period of time (no less than 3 minutes but felt like a next to forever 5 minutes) is definitely a problem. The problem: EDITING. I enjoyed the warehouse scene, as we all have been wondering what is with the warehouse since the original movie in the 1970â€™s, but wouldnâ€™t everyone else have done more than just seeking the one single item in mind specially when you were told that this is the warehouse of the US secrets? Thatâ€™s just too much of a one track mind with me. The entrance of Karen Allen was just simply did her wrong, no matter how much I like her character and her acting, and her as a person. She came out from the tent and there she was, is that it? I can open my mind and accept the sword fight and the jungle chase, and all those other easy to predict things leading to the inside of the tomb with 13 sets of alien skeletons with one skull missing, but what pissed me off the most is the scene when the flying saucer was taking off, Indiana Jones didnâ€™t even bother to duck behind the large stone to his left when derbies was flying everywhere, totally unlike the original movie at the lost ark opening scene, â€œNo matter what happens, donâ€™t open your eyesâ€, which created the emotion that perhaps we should close ours either but of course we kept ours opened anyway. The ending is too convenient, Indiana Jones was getting married with no incident, and a too simple of a setup for Shia LaBeouf to be the next Indiana Jones, but yet didnâ€™t even bother to leave us a sense of hope nor any reason to hope that he would even be better than the Harrison Ford Indiana Jones character, so if that is the case, why even bother to set him up and screw up the ending to begin with? Is Steven Spielberg loosing his creative mind and all he cares is to CASH IN on 30 years old previous accomplishments?</p>
<p>To Steven Spielberg: have you seen any of the BOURNE movies? You seem very out of touch with the today audience. You might want to consider stopping your CASH IN method on your 30 years old previous accomplishments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mecline</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352178</link>
		<dc:creator>Mecline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 05:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352178</guid>
		<description>Yeah because since peoples main problem was that Harrison Ford was too unlike himself, we should just replace him with a bunch of n00bs who will never be able to fit the shoes of Indiana Jones.  I love adventure films, but thats not the way it should be done. Use another character and make a series of movies from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah because since peoples main problem was that Harrison Ford was too unlike himself, we should just replace him with a bunch of n00bs who will never be able to fit the shoes of Indiana Jones.  I love adventure films, but thats not the way it should be done. Use another character and make a series of movies from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352126</link>
		<dc:creator>J.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352126</guid>
		<description>10 WAYS TO MAKE IT BETTER:

1. Eliminate the explosion at Area 51. After the rocket launch, have Indy get caught by the U.S. military, and then let the grilling begin. And get rid of the janitor from Scrubs (he was one of the agents). It was odd as hell seeing Indiana Jones running around in a pastel-painted neighborhood. Just uncomfortable and unnecessary.

2. Get rid of Marion and the whole Indy, Jr. element. Just make Mutt like Short Round: a youthful addition to the storyline. (I must admit, LeBoeuf was the only decent actor in this whole movie, surprisingly...and sadly). Too many characters means less character development.

3. Strengthen Indy. Yeah he's old, but Jesus... he looked decrepit and needy the whole time. He's not in a wheelchair yet. He's the LEAD character! It should have been Mutt who was sinking in the sand, and Indy should have saved him (by perhaps having to throw a snake at him). THAT would have been fun to watch as Indy debated saving a kid and touching a snake. Instead, Indy is saved by two weak characters and he ended up looking like a little girl. And he was way too woozy after the rocket launch, way too geriatric while tied up to the mind-reading device, way too clumsy when seeing Marion for the first time, etc., etc. Where was the "bite the bullet and sneer" Indy grimace we've grown to love? 

4. Make Indy the main focus. He seemed WAY too much like a supporting cast member. He would come more into focus by eliminating the "Return of Marion" element as mentioned above. Too many characters makes this like a group adventure. INDY should be driving the jeeps. INDY should be leading the pack. Otherwise, remove his name from the title.

5. Toughen up the bad guys. We need a little blood and less goofy cartoon-like acting out of the bad guys. Couldn't Irena Spalko have seriously stuck a sword through a few people?

6. Lessen the alien stuff. Hell, get rid of some of the Aztec/Mayan stuff too. If this were "INDIANA JONES and the SEARCH FOR ATLANTIS" then I think it would have been better and more palatable. Less alien skulls, less focus on aliens, but still a sense of "was there another race of beings here first?". It doesn't have to be more "believable" but rather, more "Indiana Jones-like." And actually seeing an alien on screen just blew it. If we have to see an alien, it should be subtle, smoky, almost apparition-like so as to leave the audience thinking, "Did I just see something?" Should have been subtle like the spirits in Raiders. Instead, it was shoved in our face. DID FORD EVEN HAVE AS GOOD A FULL-FRAME SHOT AS THE ALIEN? See point 4 above.

7. MAKE JOHN WILLIAMS WORK FOR HIS MONEY! Yes, the subtle refrain from Raiders was appropriate when we entered the Ark's hanger, and yes the "love" refrain was appropriate when Indy and Marion are flirting. BUT Williams re-used nearly identical music from the Last Crusade's Coronado boat sinking scene at parts. He also re-used some of Temple of Doom's mine cart chase scene music. Meanwhile, the "theme" for the Crystal Skull was underdeveloped and unmemorable. AND, I remember during the making of the Last Crusade, Spielberg specifically wanted LESS of the official Indy music (i.e. Da, da, da DAH!) because he knew he didn't have to sell Indy like he had to when the character was first being introduced. Here, it felt like they used the Raider's March theme way too much, almost like it was forced with the hope that we would remember it was an Indiana Jones film we were watching (which was easy to forget). I can still remember the music from Raiders' ball rolling scene, from the map room scene, etc. I can remember the music from Temple of Doom's main "Short Round / Willie" theme, and of course the mine cart theme. And we can remember the Cross of Coronado theme, the Nazi them, and grail them from Crusade. BUT NOTHING AT ALL theme-wise existed in this movie. SO SAD and inexcusable. YEAH, John Williams is lazy, lazy, lazy. Or maybe Lucas got the film to him a week before the release date and said, "Okay, we need a score before Friday."

8. URGENCY. Yes, it was fun. Yes, there was action. But there really wasn't any urgency. Remember in the Last Crusade, at the end? He wasn't just trying to find the grail, he was trying to save his dad's life. And Sallah said it best: "You must hurry, Indy!" That's what this movie was missing. But the motorcycle scene at the beginning had it and that's why it's the only memorable scene, in my opinion.

9. Film on location somewhere just as in the first films. This felt like it took place nowhere. It's cool to be able to visit the Natural Arches in Utah to see where the opening in Last Crusade was filmed. Hell, you can visit Italy if you've got the funds. Location shooting just helps to make the film feel grounded.

10. Incorporate some fans into the writing process. This should have been done for the Star Wars prequels as well. The super-secrecy is resulting in out-of-touch films.

CONCLUSION: Turn the Indiana Jones series into a James Bond-style series. That's our only hope. Remember, people were mad when Connery was replaced, and they even brought him back for one movie (although it sucked). But now, the Bond films are doing well. Basically, they can only make up for this nonsense by making a dozen more 1930-40s-era films with new, 30-something actors. That way we will be able to see a series of films, some bad, some good, instead of four films, where a quarter of them (1 of 4) are just weird. This film could be "last" chronologically, so that Ford is the one who will always "finish" the series. And a marriage is just fine in that sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 WAYS TO MAKE IT BETTER:</p>
<p>1. Eliminate the explosion at Area 51. After the rocket launch, have Indy get caught by the U.S. military, and then let the grilling begin. And get rid of the janitor from Scrubs (he was one of the agents). It was odd as hell seeing Indiana Jones running around in a pastel-painted neighborhood. Just uncomfortable and unnecessary.</p>
<p>2. Get rid of Marion and the whole Indy, Jr. element. Just make Mutt like Short Round: a youthful addition to the storyline. (I must admit, LeBoeuf was the only decent actor in this whole movie, surprisingly&#8230;and sadly). Too many characters means less character development.</p>
<p>3. Strengthen Indy. Yeah he&#8217;s old, but Jesus&#8230; he looked decrepit and needy the whole time. He&#8217;s not in a wheelchair yet. He&#8217;s the LEAD character! It should have been Mutt who was sinking in the sand, and Indy should have saved him (by perhaps having to throw a snake at him). THAT would have been fun to watch as Indy debated saving a kid and touching a snake. Instead, Indy is saved by two weak characters and he ended up looking like a little girl. And he was way too woozy after the rocket launch, way too geriatric while tied up to the mind-reading device, way too clumsy when seeing Marion for the first time, etc., etc. Where was the &#8220;bite the bullet and sneer&#8221; Indy grimace we&#8217;ve grown to love? </p>
<p>4. Make Indy the main focus. He seemed WAY too much like a supporting cast member. He would come more into focus by eliminating the &#8220;Return of Marion&#8221; element as mentioned above. Too many characters makes this like a group adventure. INDY should be driving the jeeps. INDY should be leading the pack. Otherwise, remove his name from the title.</p>
<p>5. Toughen up the bad guys. We need a little blood and less goofy cartoon-like acting out of the bad guys. Couldn&#8217;t Irena Spalko have seriously stuck a sword through a few people?</p>
<p>6. Lessen the alien stuff. Hell, get rid of some of the Aztec/Mayan stuff too. If this were &#8220;INDIANA JONES and the SEARCH FOR ATLANTIS&#8221; then I think it would have been better and more palatable. Less alien skulls, less focus on aliens, but still a sense of &#8220;was there another race of beings here first?&#8221;. It doesn&#8217;t have to be more &#8220;believable&#8221; but rather, more &#8220;Indiana Jones-like.&#8221; And actually seeing an alien on screen just blew it. If we have to see an alien, it should be subtle, smoky, almost apparition-like so as to leave the audience thinking, &#8220;Did I just see something?&#8221; Should have been subtle like the spirits in Raiders. Instead, it was shoved in our face. DID FORD EVEN HAVE AS GOOD A FULL-FRAME SHOT AS THE ALIEN? See point 4 above.</p>
<p>7. MAKE JOHN WILLIAMS WORK FOR HIS MONEY! Yes, the subtle refrain from Raiders was appropriate when we entered the Ark&#8217;s hanger, and yes the &#8220;love&#8221; refrain was appropriate when Indy and Marion are flirting. BUT Williams re-used nearly identical music from the Last Crusade&#8217;s Coronado boat sinking scene at parts. He also re-used some of Temple of Doom&#8217;s mine cart chase scene music. Meanwhile, the &#8220;theme&#8221; for the Crystal Skull was underdeveloped and unmemorable. AND, I remember during the making of the Last Crusade, Spielberg specifically wanted LESS of the official Indy music (i.e. Da, da, da DAH!) because he knew he didn&#8217;t have to sell Indy like he had to when the character was first being introduced. Here, it felt like they used the Raider&#8217;s March theme way too much, almost like it was forced with the hope that we would remember it was an Indiana Jones film we were watching (which was easy to forget). I can still remember the music from Raiders&#8217; ball rolling scene, from the map room scene, etc. I can remember the music from Temple of Doom&#8217;s main &#8220;Short Round / Willie&#8221; theme, and of course the mine cart theme. And we can remember the Cross of Coronado theme, the Nazi them, and grail them from Crusade. BUT NOTHING AT ALL theme-wise existed in this movie. SO SAD and inexcusable. YEAH, John Williams is lazy, lazy, lazy. Or maybe Lucas got the film to him a week before the release date and said, &#8220;Okay, we need a score before Friday.&#8221;</p>
<p>8. URGENCY. Yes, it was fun. Yes, there was action. But there really wasn&#8217;t any urgency. Remember in the Last Crusade, at the end? He wasn&#8217;t just trying to find the grail, he was trying to save his dad&#8217;s life. And Sallah said it best: &#8220;You must hurry, Indy!&#8221; That&#8217;s what this movie was missing. But the motorcycle scene at the beginning had it and that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s the only memorable scene, in my opinion.</p>
<p>9. Film on location somewhere just as in the first films. This felt like it took place nowhere. It&#8217;s cool to be able to visit the Natural Arches in Utah to see where the opening in Last Crusade was filmed. Hell, you can visit Italy if you&#8217;ve got the funds. Location shooting just helps to make the film feel grounded.</p>
<p>10. Incorporate some fans into the writing process. This should have been done for the Star Wars prequels as well. The super-secrecy is resulting in out-of-touch films.</p>
<p>CONCLUSION: Turn the Indiana Jones series into a James Bond-style series. That&#8217;s our only hope. Remember, people were mad when Connery was replaced, and they even brought him back for one movie (although it sucked). But now, the Bond films are doing well. Basically, they can only make up for this nonsense by making a dozen more 1930-40s-era films with new, 30-something actors. That way we will be able to see a series of films, some bad, some good, instead of four films, where a quarter of them (1 of 4) are just weird. This film could be &#8220;last&#8221; chronologically, so that Ford is the one who will always &#8220;finish&#8221; the series. And a marriage is just fine in that sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calvintower</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352052</link>
		<dc:creator>calvintower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-352052</guid>
		<description>The Ark of the Covenant, Sankara Stones, the Holy Gail all not real, only myths.   Aliens though are very real.  So why was it the hardest theme in the series to believe?

answer:  They lost the script in the spaces between spaces.  

I didn't mind the fridge, if Indy was crammed in there he could have easily survived being hurled hundreds of feet, and it was lead so that protected him from the blast, isn't that obvious.  

It was a fun time, now looking back, but I was seriously angry when I first left the theater, and I didn't want to be.  I'm not hard to please either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ark of the Covenant, Sankara Stones, the Holy Gail all not real, only myths.   Aliens though are very real.  So why was it the hardest theme in the series to believe?</p>
<p>answer:  They lost the script in the spaces between spaces.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t mind the fridge, if Indy was crammed in there he could have easily survived being hurled hundreds of feet, and it was lead so that protected him from the blast, isn&#8217;t that obvious.  </p>
<p>It was a fun time, now looking back, but I was seriously angry when I first left the theater, and I didn&#8217;t want to be.  I&#8217;m not hard to please either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351695</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 22:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351695</guid>
		<description>Real good point Jack! 
 Right on bro!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real good point Jack!<br />
 Right on bro!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351676</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351676</guid>
		<description>And another thing.
however good this movie could have been you so called 
"experts" would still have bad things to say about it. so do us a favour and shut up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another thing.<br />
however good this movie could have been you so called<br />
&#8220;experts&#8221; would still have bad things to say about it. so do us a favour and shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 21:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351666</guid>
		<description>if you were an adult when the old films came out and looked at every single detail then you would say "oh that was just awful" like you have with the new 1.

you should just watch the new one like you watched the old ones when you were a kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you were an adult when the old films came out and looked at every single detail then you would say &#8220;oh that was just awful&#8221; like you have with the new 1.</p>
<p>you should just watch the new one like you watched the old ones when you were a kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chimaera</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351565</link>
		<dc:creator>Chimaera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351565</guid>
		<description>@ jj gonzo

Are you by any chance related to "Leave Brittney Alone" guy b/c I'd really like to see your take of this on YouTube...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jj gonzo</p>
<p>Are you by any chance related to &#8220;Leave Brittney Alone&#8221; guy b/c I&#8217;d really like to see your take of this on YouTube&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj gonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351429</link>
		<dc:creator>jj gonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351429</guid>
		<description>LEAVE THE SWINGING MONKEYS ALONE!!!
(OK, THAT PART DID KINDA SUCK!!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEAVE THE SWINGING MONKEYS ALONE!!!<br />
(OK, THAT PART DID KINDA SUCK!!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj gonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351424</link>
		<dc:creator>jj gonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351424</guid>
		<description>LEAVE SHIA ALONE!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEAVE SHIA ALONE!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj gonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351422</link>
		<dc:creator>jj gonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351422</guid>
		<description>LEAVE INDY ALONE!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEAVE INDY ALONE!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj gonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351418</link>
		<dc:creator>jj gonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351418</guid>
		<description>LEAVE SPIELBERG ALONE!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEAVE SPIELBERG ALONE!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cellchild</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351280</link>
		<dc:creator>cellchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351280</guid>
		<description>Pure joy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pure joy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mecline</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351276</link>
		<dc:creator>Mecline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351276</guid>
		<description>LOL 790.

FEAR THE POWER OF THE WHIP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL 790.</p>
<p>FEAR THE POWER OF THE WHIP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPICHARRY</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351211</link>
		<dc:creator>EPICHARRY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351211</guid>
		<description>oNLY GEORGE LUCA$

would hire the writer of "RUSH HOUR 3"

to pen the most anticipated sequel of 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oNLY GEORGE LUCA$</p>
<p>would hire the writer of &#8220;RUSH HOUR 3&#8243;</p>
<p>to pen the most anticipated sequel of 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azure Trayl</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351160</link>
		<dc:creator>Azure Trayl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 14:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351160</guid>
		<description>I watched it last night and thought it was great.  You have to separate yourself from this reality and enjoy the ride.  It had everything that is classic Indy and with a few new things.  Wished the film looked as though it was filmed with the old cameras they did the original Indy movies, but technology doesn't all have those answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched it last night and thought it was great.  You have to separate yourself from this reality and enjoy the ride.  It had everything that is classic Indy and with a few new things.  Wished the film looked as though it was filmed with the old cameras they did the original Indy movies, but technology doesn&#8217;t all have those answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soundoftheground</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351135</link>
		<dc:creator>soundoftheground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351135</guid>
		<description>what did i think?
i'll let you know after the dvd is released - if i even bother renting it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what did i think?<br />
i&#8217;ll let you know after the dvd is released - if i even bother renting it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351079</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/23/indiana-jones-4-what-did-you-think/#comment-351079</guid>
		<description>Fan backlash, will help them overlook,,, what a huge opening weekend....!
 Hahaha. 

There's gonna be a sequel....
Fear it....Fear Indiana Jones!
Hahahaaa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fan backlash, will help them overlook,,, what a huge opening weekend&#8230;.!<br />
 Hahaha. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s gonna be a sequel&#8230;.<br />
Fear it&#8230;.Fear Indiana Jones!<br />
Hahahaaa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
