Indiana Jones 4 Movie Reviews

Indiana Jones

You will be able to read my review of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull later, but for now let’s take a look at what the rest of the movie critics are saying:

“I can say that if you liked the other Indiana Jones movies, you will like this one, and that if you did not, there is no talking to you. And I can also say that a critic trying to place it into a heirarchy with the others would probably keep a straight face while recommending the second pound of sausage.” Roger Ebert

“This is a 90-minute story pumped up to 123 minutes, not so much on steroids as on Frappucino, and the chance sing the old four-note tune again.” Lisa Schwarzbaum, EW.com

“KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL is very much an Indiana Jones movie and it’s a really hard movie to dislike. Everybody is having a ton of fun and it is really infectious. The film has its weaknesses, though.” Quint, AICN

“There’s a lot of magic in this film. A lot of it. I don’t think you have to be a chapter and verse fan of Indiana Jones to love it. Yes, LOVE IT. I think you just have to let go, believe and be willing to have another adventure with INDIANA JONES… because nobody, anywhere does it like Indy.” Harry, AICN

“Once you get past the initial reintroduction, though, it’s obvious that this fourth film in the Indy series really has no idea where to go. Except for the opening - which literally starts the film off with a bang - and a couple of dazzling chase sequences, “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” is about as unfocused and meandering as the title itself.” Christy Lemire, Salon.com

“If only Steven Spielberg had said “No thanks, George, I’m not into corpse fucking.” Then a trusting, wide-eyed, helplessly nostalgic audience might’ve been spared the shockingly listless spectacle that is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.” “Everyone who’s written a positive review of this movie will regret it in a year.” Jeremy Smith, CHUD

“If you want to get prepared for Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, don’t go back and watch the other Indy movies. Pull out The Lost World instead. Both films are directed by the same Steven Spielberg - bored, only mildly engaged and seemingly going through the motions. In both cases the result is superior to your average dumbass summer blockbuster, but when weighed against Spielberg’s filmography and the previous films in the franchise comes up sorely lacking.” Devin, CHUD

“There’s an unsettling amount of science-fiction in this Indy film and I don’t want to say who included it but my guess is that he may have raped your childhood back in 1999 (unfortunately, the statute of limitations has run out so tough luck). And yet, considering the time period of the 1950s and the space race with the Soviets (the new baddy army now that the Nazis are kaput), science fiction elements don’t automatically ruin this film but their inclusion is just sloppy and in bringing Indiana Jones out of the 1940s, they’ve lost the reason for why they brought him into existence.” Matt Goldberg, Collider

“He may be more grumpy and he may not be much of a dresser, but the glimmer hasn’t entirely gone out of Harrison’s eyes.” Josh Tyler, CinemaBlend

“…wraps up in a spectacle of fantastic implausibility. You can’t go into this movie expecting anything but. This is the ride you paid for, and by god, I’m happy this ride exists. So, you go with it, and you aren’t disappointed most of the time.” Matt Dentler, indieWIRE

“This is the Indiana Jones film people have been waiting for.” Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times

“The ”Crystal Skull” managed to capture that magic again in a way that sequels (especially long awaited sequels) very rarely do!” Captain Cumquat, moviehole

“The rollicking set pieces of Crystal Skull are filled with joy and are a much-needed lesson to younger directors on how to shoot action. Rather than just throwing CGI clusterbombs of explosions at the screen in an attempt to make the audience go “Wow” due to sensory overload, Spielberg structures his set pieces like a finely-oiled machine. They have beats of action and dialogue which build upon each other and keep building, to the point that you’re out of breath when they finally end. None of the action sequences quite hit the level of the giant rolling ball of the Lost Ark opening, but the car/truck chase through the Amazon is a classic of its type - more enjoyable, in my opinion, than the truck chase in Lost Ark.” The Hollywood Interview Terry Keefe

“For the hardcore Jones fans, this film was never going to live up to expectations. One cinemagoer leaving the first press screening in Cannes said: “George Lucas, you gotta stop hurting us”. But this is no Phantom Menace or Godfather III. The quality control has been maintained, despite the 19-year wait. And as Indy himself says, “I dunno kid, it’s just a story.”" Mark Savage, BBC

“Indy 4 has all the sharp writing and set design of the previous installments, but a failure of scope makes the movie seem small, and diminishes the wonder.” Ken Lowery, Pop Syndicate

“Loaded with moments referencing the earlier films and full of action sequences that don’t measure up to past highlights of the series, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crustal Skull feels simultaneously self-conscious and self-satisfied, as if a little warm glow of past glory will soothe our bumps and blows from the clumsiness of the script.” James Rocchi, Cinematical

“If this film had been called by another name, and the lead character was named “Edward Cummings” or something like that instead of Indiana Jones, I probably would have walked out of the theaters saying “You know what, that was a pretty damn good (not GREAT) movie”. But as an Indiana Jones film… one we’ve been waiting 20 years for, I can’t help but feel a little let down by it. Don’t get me wrong, I still think it was a pretty entertaining movie and well worth going to see… but it never felt like an Indy film to me, and it certainly wasn’t great enough to be worthy of the “Indiana Jones” name.” John Campea, The Movie Blog

“The big question probably on a lot of people’s minds is, “does it ruin the series the way George Lucas’ Star Wars prequels raped the magic of the Skywalker tales”? and the answer is no, but it doesn’t really elevate the series in quality either.” The Playlist

  • Toaster27
    Hmm... Some good... Some bad... Who cares anymore?! U know ur still goin!
  • Brian
    YESSSS most are good or average
    only one bad

    YAYAYAYAYAYAYAAYA
    i love harrison
  • Trebek
    Yeah I'll watch it no matter what the reviews say...But I'm only expecting it to be so so relative to Raiders, or even the others.
  • Sauce
    A mixed bag?!?! Who would have thought...Oh thats right, everyone.
  • SecretNinja
    Film critics suck!!! That's what ruined Speed Racer. Just go see the movie.


    Sent from my iPhone
  • This seems to be polarizing people alot.
  • _
    So, it's yet another mediocre fourth part. Whattasurprise.
  • duca
    I for one am very, very happy about this. It's not the next Phantom Menace!!! WOOT!! XD

    At this point can we really ask for more then that?
  • charles
    I knew it would be good. Rotten tomatoes and metacritic give it fresh and favorable reviews. I got my ticket for Saturday.
  • /m
    ..and what are the critics expect us do to to fill all that spare time?
    yu know yu wanna see it, good nor bad.. hey, its Indy!

    therefore - Lucas take your cash, he filled your time with something to talk/bitch about.
    thats the deal.
  • Captain Awesome
    The Playlist is becoming my favorite review spot as of late. I like thier honesty.


    Sent from my desktop PC
  • dav
    %#@% You George Lucas!

    -Sent from 1999 after viewing the Phantom Menace
  • Stevie-boy
    Let's face it, Temple of Doom was flawed, not least with crazy Willie & 'Goonie' Short-Round...but still really enjoyable. We still love it and think better of it than it probably really deserves so if 'Crystal' comes anywhere near this, or surpasses it, then it's gotta be great! If some of the early reviews are anything to go by then I suggest the critics lose the posturing and lighten up - it's an adventure flick, not the second coming! (Although, this remains to be seen...)
  • jim
    someone explain to me what ebert's sausage comment means...maybe it's just cuz it's early, or maybe i really am that naive...but that makes no sense to me
  • Lil' Mutty
    Hmmm sounds average, I just hope it's not anywhere as bad as the SW prequels, as they got a lot of good reviews too.
  • Floppy
    “No thanks, George, I’m not into corpse fucking.” - Hilarious.


    Sent from my uDouche
  • maremagnum
    As some have already said, who cares what the critics say? Especially when the "negative" comment that most have about the movie is that it doesn't "feel" like an Indiana Jones movie. Of course it doesn't. It's been TWENTY years since the last one. The way the critics felt about those movies back then has probably changed without them noticing. They probably only have an impression of how thay actually felt about those flicks back then. How many other great movie experinces have they had in twenty plus years? The nostalgia alone will convince some people that the previous installments feel different. You know how it is: people will say everything was better back in the day, even if, objectively, it's still the same.

    Anyway, I plan on going to see this movie and just enjoy it for what it is and I'm sure I'll come out very satisfied.
  • TempusFugit
    I'm not saying that this movie will be good or bad, as I have yet to see it, but will Harry ever stop rimming the assholes of Hollywood and drop the film geek shtick? I got tired of it five years ago and he just keeps on getting worse. AICN still looks like a site run by a hyperactive 12-year-old who thinks Independence Day is the best movie ever made.
  • Joe Newman
    I believe Ebert is comparing expectations to hunger? and that it fulfills expectations.
  • I'm gonna be pissed if we don't see any aliens in this movie.
  • J.D.
    TOO MUCH SPOILER POTENTIAL over the next week. I just keep thinking:

    "Keep your eyes shut! Don't look at it, Marion!"

    And it will be all fine.
  • Indy
    Critics are like frogs, they all ribbit the same nonsense, but in different tones and durations. Watch the trailers. Ready the troops. Its going to be a fun ride worthy of inclusion in the archives of imagination!
  • A. J.
    Ebert likes to eat two pounds of sausage.
  • The E
    Is it just me or do many of the internet critics seem very harsh this year? It doesn't matter what movie is coming out, save Batman. They are all just "F this movie" or "It sucks don't go". Obviously there are a number who are in favor, but the general majority of website reviews seem to be slamming movies left and right lately. I don't disagree, but I also want a review such that: "While this movie didn't win an Oscar in my book, it's definitely worth both matinée/nighttime ticket price" OR "This movie is only worth matinée, don't waste your money on the nighttime tickets". If I'm looking for something to go see I want to hear if its worth my money or not, cause frankly I think economically, even if I want to go to a movie and watch it objectively and unbiased.

    This is why I tend to stick to Yahoo to see if a movie is worth my money. Because they let the general public rate movies, and usually the average rating is what draws me to a movie or not. While I like critics reviews, frankly half of them are full of it.
  • Pill
    Sounds about what I expected. The previews just look like more of the same, nothing terribly original but also nothing that will really tarnish the reputation of the series.
  • Captain Awesome
    The E,

    I think it really boils down to a mix of both. It's always a give or take. You can't fully trust critical reviews, and you really can't trust general public reviews. You have to try and see what "you" think by the trailers and take some of what everyones said from both camps.

    Because while either camp 'could' be honest. Doesn't mean they always have the best intentions for others. But I do like the internet for allowing more online publications to step-in. Not everyone is as old skool as Ebert. But I do like hearing people from my demographic rate films or tell me what they thought.
  • Robert
    Also E, most movies DO actually suck. Most.
  • Captain Awesome
    I expect lots of "No! No! No! No's!" in this film

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IXCK1EyP4s
  • Toaster27
    Getcha popcorn ready...
  • jj gonzo
    FUCK all the critics, this movie is going
    to rock!!!! MORE INDY info please /film!!!!
  • Tabor
    I'm glad to see the reviews are mostly positive. I think there are and have been too many movie critics who give exaggerated negative reviews simply because they think they have a more clever and witty way of saying a movie was bad than they do of saying it was okay.
  • What a shock - the people you'd expect to like it do (Harry Knowles, Ebert, people with close ties to the industry) and the people not tied to the industry are giving honest critiques. You don't need to be a critic to see for yourself that this looks like crap.

    It's never a good thing when a movie refers to previous entries in the franchise, and without IJ 1,2, and 3, this movie would never have been made. A movie should be able to stand on it's own, and IJKCS isn't such a movie.

    Enough with the money-grubbing sequels, Spielberg, Lucas, et al - put you minds to work on something original for a change.
  • Vader182
    what the hell is with all of you people? The film has gotton 55 positives and 20 negatives. Thats about 3/4 of people think its good. Also: most top critics like the film. A lot.
  • jerry
    I Have Waited A Long Time To See Playboy Babe Miriam Gonzalez In A Film Almost As Long As I Have Waited To See The New Indy. I Out Of 2. My Dreams Answered.
  • Peter
    It's only a movie. It's all about having fun. It's not to be taken seriously. Critics that expect too much are shooting themselves in the foot. This is not suppose to be Shakespeare.
  • Laura The Saggy Woman
    I think Indy will be awesome you know?...
    its like what they always say you can't fee a horse lettuce and expect it to sh*t money..

    SENT FROM PIKACHU'S ANUS
  • Yes! A CGI alien! Lucas, you didn't let me down! (Though it would have been nice to see more than one, you doofus.) And you Spielberg, with that flying saucer hidden in the ground! What an ending! Sci-fi & archaeology are better than peanut butter & chocolate!
  • Lee Payne
    What a surprise, critics panning it, well all i can say is make your own mind up, it's only opinions of people trying to be clever, the world is a better place for having a brand new Indy film. I'm seeing it midnight on wednesday and i'm sure i'll love it, so sit back and enjoy the ride, it may never happen again. Thank you messers Spielberg, Lucas and Ford for this glorious time. By the way...................WE WANT MORE!!!!!
  • it seems like the recipe of a good Indiana Jones film would be 1 part Nazis and 1 part biblical artifact... the Soviet army does a pretty good job of replacing the Nazis, but the other ingredient...
  • Peter John
    Ive seen it and must admit that it falls short of expectation for a number of reasons. Despite many write-ups claiming that technical shots would make up majority of the film as oppose to CGI, so is not the case. Screen writer David Koepp has churned out a script lacking emotional impact. This isnt surprising as he wrote spider-man 1 which also had a questionable script. He's not alone in the blame-game, its a George Lucas story and if Lucas has proved anything as of late , its that you simply cannot re-visit past glories. At the end of the day it has the music and the actors but it just doesnt have the feel.
  • aa
    Its about time these critics (should i say spoilers) join together to produce, direct and write their own movie, then let's hear it from them, it would be one hell of criticisms, or would they.?

    let us not be hypocrites here, nobody really can resists Indy's action-scene-score and if there would be Indy 10, good or bad, you'll come to see/hear it all over again.

    tan ta ran tan.. tan ta ran.. tan ta ran tan..tan ta ran..ta ran.. ta ran

    see you at the movies!
  • Kris
    I think its time for Steven and Lucus to ritire and bow out gracefully. I have to say the movie was the worst one ive ever seen, but was the worst Indy film. Too bad. I think it had alot of potential.
  • ellis southam
    good film realy realy crap ending and you all know that i am right
  • Brian
    I thought this movie was terrible. It was by far the worse Indy film!!! From the swinging on vines like Tarzan to the endless same fighting scenes to the Aliens...it was just crap. TOTAL LET DOWN!!! It did have some good parts but overall I would give it a 4 out of 10.
  • Slut Bag
    What were you negative critics expecting?....a film written by Orson Welles, directed by Stanley Kubrick, and performed by Sir Laurence Olivier.....IT"S INDIANA JONES....REMEMBER...ACTION MOVIE...and it had plenty of it....who cares about the story...it's like all the others...relic, bad guys want it, Indy cant let them have it...there you go, secret formula...write the next one yourself if you can do better, I just gave you the formula. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
  • Simon Varty
    Im sorry to say that this latest Indiana dose not live up to the others. To add an alien story line to this latest chapter did not work and at the end of the film where the flying scorcer came out of the ground, well lets just say VERY, VERY BAD AND CHEESEY. I have just read some numbers of the money that this film is raking in, well let me ljust say the box office sales do not reflect on how good or bad a film is and this was a bad story line.
  • Goldenboy
    The first stands alone (Just watched it again, and it still rocks!)
    Better then that 2nd travesty, but not as good as the 3rd.

    My suspension of disbelief has some limitations even when it comes to fantasy. One problem I see with many films today (no I won't give any spoilers) is that with the innovation of CGI any crazy stunt you conceive of can be done with varying degrees of success, where as before you had to rely on flesh and blood stunt men. As a result you can strain credibility, and brother does this movie strain it! Also I'd really slack up on CGI animals. I've seen some well done examples, but a CGI animal tends to look like a CGI animal, particularly if you've CGI'ing a creature that exists in the real world.
  • Jim
    I will say this. The Indiana Jones movies made many a bad day much better because they make you forget if only for a few hours everything else around you. This movie still does that. It may be corny and it may be sentimental, but I wasn't sure how this movie would be considering Indy is in his 60's but he still has that charm and there are moments that just make you smile. So what if the plot isn't perfect. I for one am thankful that an old friend made another movie. As I age myself (but only 40) I wish I was in as great a shape as Harrison Ford. For those that wine about how tired it was I can only so I'm sorry, because I still loved it. I doubt it would happen but I would watch a fifth. I can only dream of having the fun Indy has when I'm 65. Rather than complain that the film wasn't perfect I would like to thank them for making another. Indy still rules!!!!! Thanks for the ride.
blog comments powered by Disqus