(mt)


rss

Be our Friend on MySpace

Entertainment Blog Top Sites

news now

JJ AbramsJJ Abrams recently spoke with the Associated Press about his upcoming Star Trek, and talked about the direction of the upcoming prequel/reboot.

“The whole point was to try to make this movie for fans of movies, not fans of `Star Trek,’ necessarily,’” Abrams said.

Not that hardcore Trek fans are being totally ignored. Abrams assures fans that “one of the writers who’s a devout Trekker” and that they were able to make sure they “were serving the people who are completely enamored with Star Trek”.

“But we are not making the movie for that contingent alone,” said Abrams. “It was an opportunity to take what I think has been a maligned world - to sound crass, a franchise - and treat it in a way that made it something that I wanted to see. To take the characters, the thoughtfulness, the personalities, the sense of adventure, the idea of humanity working together, the sense of social commentary and innovation, all that stuff. To take it and apply it in a way that felt genuinely thrilling.”

Everyone I’ve talked to about the project has hammered on this exact point. If there is one thing you’ll be able to take away from this film, it will be that Trek will have become more accessible to the mainstream public. And with the dwindling box office numbers of recent Trek releases (Nemesis), this is obviously the future of the franchise. And Abrams promises a Star Trek movie like we’ve never seen before.

“I feel like this is so unlike what you expect, so unlike the `Star Trek’ you’ve seen. At the same time, it’s being true to what’s come before, honoring it,” Abrams said. “I can say the effects for `Star Trek’ have never, ever been done like this. … I can only tell you the idea of the universe of `Star Trek’ has never been given this kind of treatment.”

Discuss: Are you excited for JJ Abrams’ Star Trek?


comments 14 Comments  printer   listen Listen 

14 Responses to “JJ Abrams’ Star Trek will be a Movie for Movie Fans, Not Star Trek Fans”

  1. Gravatar

    Yes.

    …..
    .
    Though I’ve never seen any Star Trek before. So that says alot.

  2. Gravatar

    I’ll be keeping an eye on it. Personally, I think Abrams is more a brand name than a great director but he’s competent, has a smart eye for things and it should be a fun watch.

  3. Gravatar

    Now I was never really a fan of the show, I thought it was ok but never understood the whole hype behind it, I am planning on seeing this. I wanna see what Abram’s does to the movie, and it doesn’t seem like it will be a bad movie to see either.

  4. Gravatar

    So there’s going to be Lightsabers and Midichlorians in it right?

  5. Gravatar

    I was excited by the teaser trailer. Still am.

    Then again, I’m a layman’s space geek. Human beings doing what human being do? Exploration of as much of this universe as possible? Orbital infrastructure? Hell yes.

    I was born one day shy of the anniversary of Apollo 11’s escape of Earth, and about 7 years after Apollo 17 was reclaimed by Earth. I’ve seen video games and the internet evolve from Pong and BBS’s to WoW and websites like this. I’ve seen the heralded Second Coming, the iPhone.

    I’ve never seen someone walk on the Moon except in rerun.

    If that teaser trailer is anything worth speculating about, well, maybe the movie will spark interest in doing what we do best: Exploration. And yeah, I’ve more faith in the independent creative forces than I do in the government-sanctioned acolytes to do that sort of inspiring.

  6. Gravatar

    @jrl - You are right on the money. Whether or not you liked the tv shows, this was the overall theme in most of them (from my opinion). That’ s what I enjoyed about it; not only the desire to explore, but the human need to.

  7. Gravatar

    No.

    Is there anything to substantiate the claim that JJ Abrams is a filmmaker? MI3 was not only terribly written (by the same two suits who scripted Trek), but terribly shot. It looked less like a movie than a TV show. Then again Star Trek movies basically are big TV shows, so maybe ST XI falls within JJ’s skill set. I don’t know. So much of Trek depends on the chemistry between its characters. Unproven actors + terrible writers + unproven director = big “?” for me.

  8. Gravatar

    I trust JJ. His work may not be the deepest or very profound, but I like the way he thinks and the way he approaches projects. And I think Simon Pegg as Scotty is well worth the price of admission.

    PS. I know it didn’t do well at the box office, but was I the only one who thought Nemesis was pretty good?

  9. Gravatar

    Excited about the teaser trailer? What was on there that made it so exciting other then watching a slow push into a semi constructed Enterprise?! I think the last Trek movies suffered because they were trying to hard, so this might be a good thing. So we’ll see. That is until we see more on it.

    I would have preferred James McAvoy as Scotty but I’ll take Pegg.

  10. Gravatar

    I am a huge Trek fan and am greatly excited for JJ’s vision of the franchise. No matter what, I’ll love the film just like I enjoyed Nemesis and every Star Trek film before it.

  11. Gravatar

    Abrams is a quack. we just need someone of respect and authority in the community to say it out loud so everyone else will muster the courage to say it themselves

    Lost is……well………lost and mired in ridiculously overcomplicated dribble at this point. Oh that’s right, he isn’t even the creative force behind that.

    3 mos later, cloverfiled sits in a largely ignored and seldom recalled pop culture slumber. All of the predicitions that it would change modern cinema laughably notwithstanding.

    And stx, seems like he’s just going to add more explosions and fx to the mythos. Genius? hardly. I promise to get up and walk out of the theater the moment kirk jumps out of the line of phaser fire and does a matrix-bullet-time turn in the air. :roll:

  12. Gravatar

    Where all da’ Jedi Knights at?

  13. Gravatar

    i’m looking foward to it, abrams has the midas touch and the original series is by far the most entertaining incarnation of trek…i’m not a trekkie but i’ve seen every tv show

  14. Gravatar

    Iam happy that Star Trek is getting a new fresh ideas, Ive been a fan for over 20 years, I must say that the last 2 films I was sleeping by the end of the film. I think that the old film makers are done, we need new ideas and new people like JJ to make new films.

  1.  
  2. Comment Now!

    Commenting Rules: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. /Film reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. Thank You!