<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Jon Favreau Tours the Iron Man Set</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/25/video-jon-favreau-tours-the-iron-man-set/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/25/video-jon-favreau-tours-the-iron-man-set/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 09:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jonny</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/25/video-jon-favreau-tours-the-iron-man-set/#comment-303992</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/25/video-jon-favreau-tours-the-iron-man-set/#comment-303992</guid>
		<description>Wow... That Johnny Depp mustache and soul patch looks pretty cheesy up close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; That Johnny Depp mustache and soul patch looks pretty cheesy up close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orange cinema</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/25/video-jon-favreau-tours-the-iron-man-set/#comment-303281</link>
		<dc:creator>orange cinema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/25/video-jon-favreau-tours-the-iron-man-set/#comment-303281</guid>
		<description>cool tour, but it got me thinking about marvel civil war, especially since favreau has expressed interest in an avengers film - which i feel he IS NOT the guy to helm it - but anyways if (when) they do civil war, which is best:
CG, 2D, mo-cap, or live action? (i wasn't gonna include mo-cap, cuz i think it's atrocious, but then it wouldn't be an all incompassingly fair question...however as i write this, i'm realizing that mo-cap would be ideal for the way ross did kingdom come - which i love the story but don't care for ross' style at all...sorry i'm getting so sidetracked)

my vote is gonna have to be 2D, because i feel that'd be the closest we'd get to at least having all the real actors/actresses doing the vocals.  Live would be sick, but that'd be a trilogy i just don't see being greenlit - regardless of how much holy-fucking-shit $$$ it'd make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool tour, but it got me thinking about marvel civil war, especially since favreau has expressed interest in an avengers film - which i feel he IS NOT the guy to helm it - but anyways if (when) they do civil war, which is best:<br />
CG, 2D, mo-cap, or live action? (i wasn&#8217;t gonna include mo-cap, cuz i think it&#8217;s atrocious, but then it wouldn&#8217;t be an all incompassingly fair question&#8230;however as i write this, i&#8217;m realizing that mo-cap would be ideal for the way ross did kingdom come - which i love the story but don&#8217;t care for ross&#8217; style at all&#8230;sorry i&#8217;m getting so sidetracked)</p>
<p>my vote is gonna have to be 2D, because i feel that&#8217;d be the closest we&#8217;d get to at least having all the real actors/actresses doing the vocals.  Live would be sick, but that&#8217;d be a trilogy i just don&#8217;t see being greenlit - regardless of how much holy-fucking-shit $$$ it&#8217;d make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/25/video-jon-favreau-tours-the-iron-man-set/#comment-303201</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/04/25/video-jon-favreau-tours-the-iron-man-set/#comment-303201</guid>
		<description>"Iron Man" has suffered from WAY too much exposure whereas "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull"  has suffered from too little. The studios (or whoever the fuck is in charge of this shit) should follow the example of "The Dark Knight." Their brilliant "slow burn" campaign has perfectly moderated my excitement (unlike the aforementioned films which have gone either completely overboard or dropped the ball by releasing too little too late). Seriously, who are the ad wizards behind Batman's campaign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iron Man&#8221; has suffered from WAY too much exposure whereas &#8220;Kingdom of the Crystal Skull&#8221;  has suffered from too little. The studios (or whoever the fuck is in charge of this shit) should follow the example of &#8220;The Dark Knight.&#8221; Their brilliant &#8220;slow burn&#8221; campaign has perfectly moderated my excitement (unlike the aforementioned films which have gone either completely overboard or dropped the ball by releasing too little too late). Seriously, who are the ad wizards behind Batman&#8217;s campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
