informers2.jpg

Compared to most authors, onetime New York it-boy Bret Easton Ellis’s works have had a pretty good translation record at the cinema. American Psycho, The Rules of Attraction and Less Than Zero were all pretty faithful, quality adaptations that kept Ellis’s sensational penchant for drugs, kinky sex and sociopathic detachment intact. A tall order these days. Next in line is this fall’s The Informers. Not only did Ellis co-write the screenplay for his 1995 interlocked collection of twisted tales set in the ’80s, but the film easily has the coolest cast of any Ellis flick: Mickey Rourke, Kim Basinger, Winona Ryder, Billy Bob Thornton, Pineapple ExpressAmber Heard and Brad Renfro’s last theatrical role.

Well, now it seems that the key element that made The Informers stand out from its darkly hedonistic pack, a good dose of the supernatural, including a vampire storyline starring Superman ReturnsBrandon Routh as the book’s main vampire, Jamie, has either been “exorcised” or dumped altogether. Odd. Actor John Graham, who has a rather large role as the son to Thornton’s Hollywood exec, expressed dissonance about the film’s seemingly last minute change to IGN

“There are no more vampires. They took the vampires out. There are no zombies or monsters either,” he announces. “This is more about the narcissistic side of people’s characters. God knows why they took the vampire characters out. I can’t say if I was pleased or displeased, that is just the way it is.”

Sounds as if Routh is no longer in the film, eh? If so, that’s a pretty big blow for him, as it would have given the All-American actor a dose of indie cred. There’s speculation that Ellis himself made the decision to ditch the fanged murderers from the film version due to criticism the book’s subplot received originally. Ho-hum. Fans will be bummed. Has to be more to it than that though, right? Perhaps director Gregor Jordan (Buffalo Soldiers, Ned Kelly) wasn’t digging the footage? If anyone has a contact or, cough, informant on this film, let us know.

Ellis is really starting to dive into Hollywood, with an adaptation of his batshit semi-autobiographical Lunar Park due in 2009, along with The Frog King, another writer-obsessed flick starring Joseph Gordon-Levitt that he wrote an original screenplay for. Also kicking around is Roger Avary’s third (yes, third) adaptation Glamorama, which would follow The Rules of Attraction and its obscure, never released, mysterious spin-off film Glitterati starring Kip Pardue.

Discuss: Any Informers fans pissed? We haven’t heard much from this flick as of yet, but how many of you anticipate it? Who’s seen Glitterati? What’s the best Ellis movie? 

  • orange cinema
    lately with all the reboots, asian cinema adaptations & comic book films, i've been really wanting to see something new/different/unusual. something that really makes me say 'what the fuck?!', with a smile. i thought that an easton ellis LA drama with a touch of vampire would be just that, but i guess not. rules/zero/psycho were all amazing, but none of em crossed the supernatural line, and i thought informers would be original in that sense. im sure it'll still be a good easton ellis twisted story, just not as 'WTF', you know?
  • brian
    Rules of attraction and less than zero faithful adaptions? Whhaaa? Less than Zero was an absolutely fantastic book...the movie for whatever reason, commercial appeal i assume, gave Downey's character's storyline center stage when it was really only a marginal part of the book.

    While rules of attraction was an awesome adaptation, it really wasn't that accurate either.

    This is the first I've heard of this movie so I'm pretty excited. I love Easton Ellis.
  • Butch Newton
    Ive read all of Bret's stuff and thought Rules of Attraction was pretty spot on, an extremely underrated film. As for the Informers, I don't even see how the movie will make sense. The vampires were totally out of left field in the book, but overall it fit somehow because the whole thing was so scattershot. Will the movie work without the fangs? It should, especially if they are able to intertwine all the stories from the novel in the first place. Thats the biggest challenge in my mind. Im guessing its going to be really fragmented on screen and a lot of people are going to be disappointed expecting a more central plot and character arcs. I sure hope Avary gets out of the legal mess he is in because I think he is the only one who should be allowed to do Bret Easton Ellis adaptations.
  • less than zero was in no way faithful to the book. the others were faithful in theme, for sure, but not so much in detail. it bothers me that they're taking the vampires out - filmmakers seem to love editing out the absurdity in Ellis's work, and that's part of what makes his writing so great. oh well..
  • dan
    i hated less than zero and american psycho, but i thought rules of attraction pretty much nailed it. i went to a reading ellis had here in l.a. when lunar park came out, and someone asked him what his least favorite adaptation was. he wouldn't come out and say it, but he said that he found it interesting that all the characters in less than zero were explicitly described as blonde, and the actors they cast were all brunettes. i wish hollywood weren't such a giant high school so that people could talk freely about what they don't like without fearing that it will jeopardize their chances of getting something else made.

    as far as an informers movie, i agree that i don't see how it could possibly work.
  • Robert
    I have no opinion, but I love that image you guys used.
  • oscar
    Good. The vampires idea sounded stupid. As a drama, this film might actually win some awards. As a "vampire movie" it become fringe fair, ignored by critics and award voters.
  • How can the vampires be removed from this film? This is what makes ellis an excellent writer. Ellis brings supernatural elements to the "real world" and the idea is completely realistic.
    Are all the sci-fi elements of Lunar Park going to be removed as well?

    This is ridiculous.
  • stephanie
    why the hell does this article say Less than zero, the film, was adapted 'fairly' from the book? that movie is garbage and isn't like the book at all!!! that's why BEE refused to go to the premiere back in the 80's. seriously.

    back to actual articles. i'm extremely dissappointed in this. i just hope they don't do it. the vampire chapter in the book was by far the best- the most disturbing, interesting, etc. better not ruin the movie.
  • Patrick Bateman
    "American Psycho, The Rules of Attraction and Less Than Zero were all pretty faithful, quality adaptations"

    You're joking right? I've read all of Bret Easton Ellis' novels several times over. American Psycho, yes, almost completely faithful and close and also a very good standalone film. Rules of Attraction changed the time setting from the mid-80s to present day in the film, which takes away the whole point that it is a satire of the era with all the excess, etc. Less Than Zero had nothing in common with the novel except for the character's names. That's it.
blog comments powered by Disqus