<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box Office: Semi-Pro up only 10% Sat for $6.1M; Ferrell&#8217;s Flop headed for only $15.1M!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  9 Jul 2008 16:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223698</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223698</guid>
		<description>The budget of the movie, as well as the fact that it is an R rated comedy, is absolutely relevant in the context of a conversation about the movie being a financial "flop."

What you are arguing, ajadoniz, is a completely different matter. Regardless of how much you may have liked it, "Stranger Than Fiction" had a weaker opening than "Semi-Pro." This post is about the box office returns, not about critical reception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The budget of the movie, as well as the fact that it is an R rated comedy, is absolutely relevant in the context of a conversation about the movie being a financial &#8220;flop.&#8221;</p>
<p>What you are arguing, ajadoniz, is a completely different matter. Regardless of how much you may have liked it, &#8220;Stranger Than Fiction&#8221; had a weaker opening than &#8220;Semi-Pro.&#8221; This post is about the box office returns, not about critical reception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajadoniz</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223678</link>
		<dc:creator>ajadoniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223678</guid>
		<description>The budget of the movie is irrelevant, it's the premise that is despicable. "Watch Will Ferrell be Will Ferrell in.... wait for it... BASKETBALL!... AND HE HAS AN AFRO!" I thought Ferrell had taken notice on the trend he was making when he started in 'Stranger  Than Fiction' to derail the hackiness of which he was becoming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The budget of the movie is irrelevant, it&#8217;s the premise that is despicable. &#8220;Watch Will Ferrell be Will Ferrell in&#8230;. wait for it&#8230; BASKETBALL!&#8230; AND HE HAS AN AFRO!&#8221; I thought Ferrell had taken notice on the trend he was making when he started in &#8216;Stranger  Than Fiction&#8217; to derail the hackiness of which he was becoming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theREELaddict</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223613</link>
		<dc:creator>theREELaddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223613</guid>
		<description>Rob,

I'm not quite sure I agree with the Will Ferrell backlash. I think the guy's incredibly talented. I'm just tired of seeing the same movie over and over again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure I agree with the Will Ferrell backlash. I think the guy&#8217;s incredibly talented. I&#8217;m just tired of seeing the same movie over and over again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223219</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223219</guid>
		<description>i saw this movie sat. and there was maybe 20 people the movie wasn't bad at all i thought it was funny the trailers do not do the moive justice it's will ferrel doing what will ferrel does best and thats him play will ferrel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i saw this movie sat. and there was maybe 20 people the movie wasn&#8217;t bad at all i thought it was funny the trailers do not do the moive justice it&#8217;s will ferrel doing what will ferrel does best and thats him play will ferrel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: random links at trey taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223140</link>
		<dc:creator>random links at trey taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223140</guid>
		<description>[...] Semi-ProÂ flops.Â Will Ferrell&#8217;s top 10 live actionÂ openings.      in entertainment, random foolishness and random links.         Feed for this Entry Trackback Address [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Semi-ProÂ flops.Â Will Ferrell&#8217;s top 10 live actionÂ openings.      in entertainment, random foolishness and random links.         Feed for this Entry Trackback Address [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223137</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223137</guid>
		<description>The Will Ferrell backlash is hillarious since two years ago he was untouchable.  Now he's Chevychasing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Will Ferrell backlash is hillarious since two years ago he was untouchable.  Now he&#8217;s Chevychasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223135</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223135</guid>
		<description>I think you need to calm down and note the budget of Semi-Pro and the fact that it is an R rated comedy. It still was the number one movie of the weekend and I think it will end up taking in a decent return for what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to calm down and note the budget of Semi-Pro and the fact that it is an R rated comedy. It still was the number one movie of the weekend and I think it will end up taking in a decent return for what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajadoniz</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223034</link>
		<dc:creator>ajadoniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223034</guid>
		<description>BUT IT'S WILL FERRELL PLAYING BASKETBALL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUT IT&#8217;S WILL FERRELL PLAYING BASKETBALL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ciji</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223007</link>
		<dc:creator>ciji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-223007</guid>
		<description>...he said with a particular glee.

backlash is the new black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;he said with a particular glee.</p>
<p>backlash is the new black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuffor</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-222990</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuffor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-222990</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I couldnâ€™t understand that â€œbuzzâ€ over this coming movie on these movie blog sites the past few months. The trailers stunk to me.

I think itâ€™s an issue of being â€œall thatâ€ over anything Will Farrell, regardless of what he does.

Not so unusual with fanboy sites, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I couldnâ€™t understand that â€œbuzzâ€ over this coming movie on these movie blog sites the past few months. The trailers stunk to me.</p>
<p>I think itâ€™s an issue of being â€œall thatâ€ over anything Will Farrell, regardless of what he does.</p>
<p>Not so unusual with fanboy sites, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trebek</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-222924</link>
		<dc:creator>Trebek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/02/box-office-semi-pro-up-only-10-sat-for-61m-ferrells-flop-headed-for-only-151m/#comment-222924</guid>
		<description>Surprise surprise...

It probably has something to do with the fact that all his movies are basically the same. Who the hell wants to see Ferrell doing Ferrell again? Not me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprise surprise&#8230;</p>
<p>It probably has something to do with the fact that all his movies are basically the same. Who the hell wants to see Ferrell doing Ferrell again? Not me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
