<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek Pushed Back to May 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  9 Jul 2008 16:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eine jede Handlung ist recht, die oder nach deren Maxime die Freiheit der WillkÃ¼r eines jeden mit jedermanns Freiheit nach einem allgemeinen Gesetze zusammen bestehen kann. &#124; F!XMBR</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203633</link>
		<dc:creator>Eine jede Handlung ist recht, die oder nach deren Maxime die Freiheit der WillkÃ¼r eines jeden mit jedermanns Freiheit nach einem allgemeinen Gesetze zusammen bestehen kann. &#124; F!XMBR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203633</guid>
		<description>[...] Star Trek Pushed Back to May 2009 Anstatt Ende 2008 wirds Mitte 2009 - aus der Rubrik Studiopolitik. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Star Trek Pushed Back to May 2009 Anstatt Ende 2008 wirds Mitte 2009 - aus der Rubrik Studiopolitik. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obsessed With Film &#187; STAR TREK lowers it&#8217;s warp speed. Expected to arrive May 2009!</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203583</link>
		<dc:creator>Obsessed With Film &#187; STAR TREK lowers it&#8217;s warp speed. Expected to arrive May 2009!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203583</guid>
		<description>[...] - slash film   These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - slash film   These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sciretta</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203202</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sciretta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203202</guid>
		<description>BxA, Paramount has confirmed this story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BxA, Paramount has confirmed this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BxA</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203199</link>
		<dc:creator>BxA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203199</guid>
		<description>does anyone have any proof of this??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone have any proof of this??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203190</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203190</guid>
		<description>Thats too bad, movie looks pretty good, havent watched the films in a while but i wanna see this one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats too bad, movie looks pretty good, havent watched the films in a while but i wanna see this one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203122</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203122</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think they should have released it in Jan. You know, bring back the good films for January. It sucks having a month without a good film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think they should have released it in Jan. You know, bring back the good films for January. It sucks having a month without a good film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zap Rowsdower</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203093</link>
		<dc:creator>Zap Rowsdower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/02/13/star-trek-pushed-back-to-may-2009/#comment-203093</guid>
		<description>Exactly my thoughts when I first read the headline, Peter.  

I bet it's a combination of both reasons, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly my thoughts when I first read the headline, Peter.  </p>
<p>I bet it&#8217;s a combination of both reasons, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
