Comments on: Razzie Award Nominees Announced

By: » Se anuncian las nominaciones a los Premios Razzie 2008 Â» Cinencuentro - Todo el cine del PerÃº

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:56:47 +0000

[...] (VÃa /film) [...]

By: $ J Money $

$ J Money $ — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:58:55 +0000

what about Alba if she loses/wins [whatever happens when you get a razzie] for Good Luck Chuck… I will be mad….She was too cute in that movie

By: Just Another Day » Blog Archive » Razzie schlÃ¤gt wieder zu

Just Another Day » Blog Archive » Razzie schlÃ¤gt wieder zu — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:51:48 +0000

[...] /Film - Razzies.com [...]

By: Baby

Baby — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:26:02 +0000

Hey! “I Know Who Killed Me” wasn’t that bad. I think it is better than you imagine. It was good! Watching Lindsay Lohan walk her way through this film, I was surprised she could actually ACT. Ya! Wonderful! I think if you have ever seen the movie than you already know, and if you haven’t, then you need to: dealstudio.com/searchdeals.php?deal_id=79304&ru=279

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:39:05 +0000

I’ll add to the list of people saying Chuck & Larry wasn’t bad.

Besides Where’s My Caddy, here’s a list of other horrible movies that were snubbed… Music & Lyrics, Hannibal Rising, In the Land of Women, also a more controversial pic would have been 300, which I absolutely hated though could appreciate on some level for being something new, but what ridiculous acting! I think if you’re going to lampoon Nicolas Cage and Adam Sandler, you should think about how eye rollingly absurd the 300 cast was starting with Gerard Butler.

By: Juice Direction

Juice Direction — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:30:58 +0000

The Number 23 was a lot better than you’re making it out to be. It was a really good film; engaging and enjoyable. Easily a 7-8 out of 10.

Chuck and Larry was also not nearly as bad as that. It may not have been shakespeare, but it was definitely watchable, despite having been far from original source material.

Compare these two to the far worse - Epic Movie, or Norbit. Or the merely mediocre films released in 2007. Chuck and Larry and 23 were far better than them.

By: Hunter Stephenson

Hunter Stephenson — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:16:33 +0000

@OC

You are not banned dude.

I think IKWKM was an easy out for the Razzies. I’ve heard the same type of “hey, wait, I sort of freaking like this” buzz from a few peeps, and I think Lohan should be excluded from the awards in general. She’s in a entirely different realm from something like Who’s Your Caddy?

Thx for admitting it.

By: Orange cinema

Orange cinema — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:08:51 +0000

you guys are gonna hang me for saying this…but IKWKM was somewhat entertaining! It was brutal, had some sex, and I know it wasn’t the best, but it wasn’t the worst. I’m as harsh a critic as the next fan, but we rented this one night and made it all the way through. I hope I don’t get banned from /film for posting this!

By: Hunter Stephenson

Hunter Stephenson — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:37:53 +0000

@Santiago and CST

INPYC&L is widely considered by many in the Hollywood community to be culturally regressive.

By: Santiago

Santiago — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:07:54 +0000

I agree. Chuck and Larry wasn’t that bad, I don’t understand why it’s considered as the worst movie. There were movies alot worse than this one.

By: F5 — Die goldene Himbeere - Razzie Award Nominees 2007

F5 — Die goldene Himbeere - Razzie Award Nominees 2007 — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:02:49 +0000

[...] (via) [...]

By: CST

CST — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:59:46 +0000

Yea, Chuck and Larry was not all that bad….Pathfinder was bad

By: Cenzo

Cenzo — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:46:09 +0000

Hey… “Chuck and Larry” was pretty good… atleast it had the Jessica Biel factor.

What about “Pathfinder”? … that was a turd.

By: GregoryV

GregoryV — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:25:21 +0000

im surprised uwe boll isnt on this list.