<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool Stuff: Back to the Future Enchantment Under the Sea Dance Minimates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: frankie23</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-178737</link>
		<dc:creator>frankie23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-178737</guid>
		<description>So, a figure of Marty, and his... mom? Creeeepy...

Oh, and you're right Jan, she's much bustier in the closeup image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, a figure of Marty, and his&#8230; mom? Creeeepy&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, and you&#8217;re right Jan, she&#8217;s much bustier in the closeup image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sir jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-175331</link>
		<dc:creator>sir jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-175331</guid>
		<description>i like this one a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like this one a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-Sol</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-175135</link>
		<dc:creator>B-Sol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-175135</guid>
		<description>Now that's cool. If only we could get a George McFly figure with punching action!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s cool. If only we could get a George McFly figure with punching action!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-174902</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-174902</guid>
		<description>Post-Rape Attempt Lorraine: Perfect for the 4+ crowd. This wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post-Rape Attempt Lorraine: Perfect for the 4+ crowd. This wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-174900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/01/20/cool-stuff-back-to-the-future-enchantment-under-the-sea-dance-minimates/#comment-174900</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one noticing the difference in Lorraines cleavage? The packaged product looks a whole lot less "enhanced" than the close-up product shot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one noticing the difference in Lorraines cleavage? The packaged product looks a whole lot less &#8220;enhanced&#8221; than the close-up product shot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
