Cloverfield Review

Cloverfield

I saw it! It’s alive! It’s Huge! I just got home from a screening of Cloverfield, the JJ Produced monster film which has hogged the online hype since July. I don’t have the time to do an extensive review of this movie, as I need to catch a plane to Park City for the Sundance Film Festival in just seven hours. But here is my first take.

The potential problem with a movie like Cloverfield is that the hype can wear thin reallt fast, especially when you’re subject them to near-pointless online viral storylines (what was the point of Jamie’s videos anyways?). But things ramped up these last few weeks, and I feel like I’ve seen more of this movie online than I ever wanted to beforehand. It’s a difficult balance to keep the hype going without giving away too much. And sure, they didn’t show the monster, but seeing too much beforehand was my second biggest concern going into the film. Maybe I had already seen all the cool sequences from the film in the advertising?

Friends, I am here to tell you that there is nothing to be concerned about. There is a lot in this movie that was not shown in the marketing. There is more monster than I originally believed there would be. And yes, you do get to see him very very very close-up. He’s unlike any movie monster I’ve ever seen before. A very cool and unique design, and I think you’ll be pleased. The sound design is incredible, I seriously wouldn’t be shocked if this got nominated for some sound related awards, possibly an Oscar (yes, seriously).

My biggest concern going into the film was about the characters. Would I really care about Rob and Beth and all the characters briefly shown running around in the trailer?

Surprisingly, I was wrong again. The characters are very relatable, even though you don’t get too much background information on any of them. The first 20 or so minutes are monster free. It’s all background, getting to know some of the characters, and it’s all a slow build for the monster’s first reveal. Because when the shit hits the fan, you feel like you’re stuck in the middle of this horrific situations with a group of new friends. Of course, the story follows Rob, a young many who has just gotten a job in Japan. His goodbye party is interrupted by the monstrous scream we’ve all seen a billion and a half times in the teaser trailer. While everyone is trying to get out of New York City, Rob is trying to reconnect with Beth, who is trapped in midtown. But the true shining star in this film is a guy named HUD, who appears on camera just a few times. But you will get to know him very well. HUD is the man behind the video camera, documenting the whole thing as it goes down. His running commentary is hilarious, and you will quickly grow to love him. HUD is one of the reasons that Cloverfield works so well. He’s the funny best friend comic relief character that makes most romantic comedies bearable. But instead of being employed to a few funny appearances, the love-able comic relief character is front and center. He is more you than Rob, and maybe it’s better that way. But its so interesting to see a story from the point of view of this type of character. Refreshing even.

Does the handheld format get annoying? Surprisingly, no. Blair Witch used the first person idea as a gimmick. Cloverfield takes the idea, and uses it to tell a story. I really don’t want to give-away any spoilers, even though enough of the film is already online for you to piece together.

Cloverfield is not shakespeare. It’s not a masterpiece. It has flaws (mostly having to do with little conveniences throughout the story (The “they just happen to be there sort of stuff, or the that guy would never let them do THAT sort of stuff. You’ll see what I mean), but it isn’t anything that takes away from the big picture.

Cloverfield is a fun movie. Plain and simple. It’s sit back, relax and go. It’s a roller coaster ride. JJ Abrams wanted to make an American monster movie, and he has done just that. Cloverfield is not a Godzilla rip-off, it’s the reinvention of the monster film. This is the story about characters trapped in a monster film. They aren’t the characters that would be in the big Hollywood blockbuster version, or even an D-level take by The Asylum or Troma. These characters are the people running away from Godzilla. They have no urge to defeat the monster, they just want to get away and reconnect with their loved ones. This is a human story which just happens to take place during this gigantic moment of fear.

/Film Rating: 8 out of 10

About the Author

Peter Sciretta is a film geek and popcultured fanboy living in San Francisco. He created /Film in 2005.

  • Hey, saw the movie tonight at a media screening - think it may have been a tad over hyped, but great fun to watch!
  • Shawn
    I too saw it at a media screening. I liked it. It wasn't a movie that I thought I HAVE to see, but with the free screen invite, and like Peter says I got to really sit back and enjoy it. One thing dawned on me as I'm taking it all in...Lonelygirl15. Cloverfield felt like a youtube movie, which is what I think JJ was trying for in some respect. I also realized that it took a tremendous amount of work to make it look honest and effortless. J.J Abrams and who ever directed it (I asked while we where waiting and sadly none of us could remember) made a very good monster film that wasn't ridiculous. I really felt like I was watching some found footage, like on youtube, only a million inches big and in HD.
  • Mik
    That was the worst movie i have ever seen. it was only 75 minutes long and had NO plot whatsoever. TERRIBLE!!
  • $ J Money $
    dang it you stole my idea of a movie review. I was gonna use that as my first line "I saw it, It's Alive, It's HUGE!" haha I have been using a countdown on myspace and was getting stoked to use that line... okay I still will use it =]

    I am excited for friday... 2 days!!!!
  • Great "first take."
    I'm looking forward to this movie, not like "Indy 4", but sort of.
  • kiko
    After all these reviews, I think I'll wait for the YouTube version to see this film!
  • yourmom
    Saw it at the sneak peak in Pittsburgh.... it seriously made my head hurt. I have never heard people boo-ing when a movie ended, but they did last night. I felt worse off with motion sickness than with blair witch.... did HUD have parkinson's? While the experience felt real, the movie just ends. There is no tie in or anything like that. With Blair witch, it was supposed to be that the kids dides and this was the tape they found. That is what they tried to do with this move, but last I checked, NYC is still there, and this "thing" doesn't exist. So to end the way it did after only 74 min of camera shaking motion sickness (and I don't get sick easily) was just disappointing. Rental....maybe
  • $hn@zy
    Thank god this movie is good. Now I can go into that theater on friday and not be worried about if this movie will meet my expectations because clearly by your review, this movie will be good. I CANT WAIT!!!
  • richard herring
    I HATED IT. THE MOVIE HAD NO PLOT, THE MONSTER ISN'T SCARY AND POOR CGI. POOR BLAIR WICTH RIP OFF.DO NOT GO SEE THIS MOVIE NOt WORTH THE 6 MONTH OF HYPE. WORST MONSTER MOVIE EVER MADE
  • Bajsa
    Absolutely agree. This movie is worthless. Good thing it only cost 2.40 to rent.
  • Robert
    Sounds like it could be a fun, see it once, event/experience-type movie. Blair Witch did certainly have the advantage of getting the jump on the viral marketing concept. But did anyone really watch it more than once? I'll check this out and I'm all for people at least trying to do something new.
  • Jerry Butler
    So... basically, it is Mtv's The Hills if a Godzilla monster suddenly decided to stomp on Hollywood?

    Pass.
  • lme
    Worst Movie ever...hand held camera work got old very very fast, there was no character development, and the monster looked like a pissed off turtle. best part of the movie was when they died in the end and the movie was over. Put this one in the $1.99 DVD bin now, so no one else has to suffer. save your money.
  • Orange cinema
    @lme: I hope yer kidding about the end, otherwise put *spoilers* in the beginning of yer remarks you rookie posting dipshit.
  • kiko
    lme...you shouldn't spoil...it's against net laws...ad some ethics...
  • xnight
    I'll be the judge of how good or bad the movie is when i go see it thursday at midnight, i wont let the party pooping bad reviewers ruin it for me.............
    That is just fricken rude
  • A.J.
    Watch Rob and the gang go find Beth in this new 2-minute clip on yahoo.

    http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809873032/video/...

    Now that we know all the viral marketing stuff has nothing to really do with the movie and was done just to keep us busy until the movies's release, for those who care anymore, there's a new picture up at:

    www.1-18-08.com
  • josh
    So, no credit towards Matt Reeves who actually directed the film, but props to JJ Abrams instead? Too bad for Reeves he didn't make a great tv series ("Lost") and a medicore film ("MI:3").

    Anyway, glad it turned out good - I liked the concept. I'll be checking it out this weekend.
  • Grub
    So I saw the movie at a screening last night...not great but definitely not bad either. For those saying no character development, there was quite a bit actually, and it gets tied into the random clips being recorded over on the tape you're watching. And besides its a monster movie not a drama about character development. You DO get to see the monster, which is good and bad. Good because, phew I got to see the monster that has been hyped up beyond belief, and bad because well its just not that cool of a monster. The camera shakes A TON! It was way worse than the Blair Witch and actually gave me a headache, I know, I know, suck it up. On the flip side HUD is hilarious and saves the movie from being a little boring at times. SPOILER The parasites, yes there are little creatures, are pretty cool and do look like the Starship Troopers bugs. Overall it was pretty good, I'd give it 6/10...2.5 Stars...One Thumb Up. It was worth going to the theatre for but I'm not sure how many times I will see it.
  • Dirk
    Wow. Seriously? After ALLLLL that viral marketing, and that's all we get?

    I don't wanna be a f*ck up like lme, so I won't say too much. But damn. As someone who has followed the online campaign very closely, the movie is a HUGE let down. For anyone else that has payed as much attention to the online shiza, you will know what I'm talking about when you finally see this glorified turd. Peter presents them as, little conveniences. I call 'em HOLES!

    My recommendation, and I don't care what any of you have to say, is download the Torrent of some dude with a hand held filming the movie that was filmed with a hand held.
  • Dirk
    say that three times fast.
  • Frank
    Guys ignore the hater reviews. I saw it last night, I have been following the viral campaign... had very high expectations for the movie and came out completely satisfied. Hell, I'm going to watch it again on Friday. Everyone I went to the screening with loved it and other people at the screening also seem to like it. And all the credible movie websites have so far given it positive reviews. It is a very different kind of monster movie, sure you get to see the monster and the destruction but that for the most part is not the point. The point is that you are living this horrific situation with these characters and you actually care about these characters. I know the previews make it look like they are just going to be 'oh look that guy just got ripped by the monster' sort of characters just there to get killed like in most horror movies but no you actually care about them. The best comparison I could think of is Titanic, in Titanic you had the ship sinking and some really cool effects but that movie was about Rose and Jack, the sinking just happened to be there. Also, the movie is absolutely terrifying at times. A lot of monster movies go for the camp and coolness factor. Godzilla had scenes where you just laughed at godzilla (both the american version and the japanese one) and even in the Host used the monster for laughs but this guy... he is intense there is nothing funny about him and whereas in movies like Godzilla and Transformers we had fun seeing the buildings being destroyed and mayhem being spread here it is scary and terrifying. Again back to my titanic comparison, in the hands of someone like Michael Bay or Roland Emmerich titanic would have been about 'oh look this ship is sinking and look how cool it is' and have a bunch of flag waving hero soldiers trying to help but instead when the titanic sank it was sad and scary, the same is true for Cloverfield when you see the buildings fall and the aftermath of the attack it is not cool, it is not funny it is scary.

    As far as the shaky cam goes; I got used to it after the first 10minutes and after that I barely even noticed it except in some of the running sequences. The camera is shaky but is not any worse then what you see in the Bourne movies. You should not have a problem with it unless you are very sensitive.

    I loved this movie, it was entertaining and unique, don't take my word for it if you don't want to but if you even have the slightest interest in seeing this movie... go see it in a theater, it is the kind of movie that you have to experience in a theater. I think this movie may break some box office records. People are going to like what they see.
  • B33
    It's amazingly sad how many people bitch. Don't bash the film simply because your a pussy and can't handle the style in which the story is presented (visually).
  • Dirk
    The movie by itself....not too bad.

    With all the dreck (in the most literal sense) leading up to it......so not worth it.

    The point is, would this movie stand on it's own? Think about ALL the hype leading up to it and for how long it's been going on. Really stop and think about it for a second. The movie was enjoyable and all. But did it really need all this of this hype? If it's as great as you say it is, why all the BS beforehand that SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT didn't even f*ckin get mentioned?!
  • xnight
    What f^&ing hype? two thirds of the people i ask what they thought about the upcoming "Cloverfield" movie looked at me as if i had 3 heads and a tail...... the hype was amongst us monster movie fans.

    A movie that DEFINETLY did not deserve the hype was "I am legend" most of the special effects (the reason why we watch these movies, not because we believe in monsters) were recreating vegetation overgrowth in manhattan.
  • As far as anyone hating Cloverfield goes, it's only because Cloverfield didn't end up being the movie they though it should be. It's a damn good, enjoyable MONSTER MOVIE. Nothing more, nothing less.
  • Jerry Butler
    Ah the old phantom menace backlash
  • Jerry Butler
    /argument
  • Hi Peter!!!

    I'm from Brazil and I like so much your blog! Congratulations!

    I'm really hope for something sacarstic in your review about Cloverfield. We're still can't watch this movie here in Brazil, for while, just in the next month, but I don't belive this can be a GREAT movie.

    You sad everything in this frase:
    "Cloverfield is a fun movie"

    Now, I know what a exactly kind of a movie I have to expect.

    God work Peter!

    Bye!
  • Grub
    I can't believe you compared Cloverfield to Craptanic, if thats the case you would be saying the movie was a horrible, love story with some wreckage in the background. As I said overall the movie was GOOD. Not great, but good. If you can get used to the Parkinson's hand cam then I think maybe something is wrong with your eyes. Also you do have to see this in a theatre if you want to see it as you wont get the same effect from a home theatre or computer.
  • Listen, I'm a huge stickler for plot and character development even when it comes to horror and sci-fi movies and I'm here to tell you that this movie WORKED.

    If you HATE shakey-cam, then by all means skip it, but as a whole and as presented with the concept used this movie was a blast.

    I think a lot of people went in with a chip on their shoulder regarding this movie due to all the viral hype. I went in separating the hype and just watched the movie "clean."

    As opposed to boos, our audience applauded.

    I actually gave it a higher rating on Screen Rant than Peter did here.

    Vic
  • Robert
    Lucky for me I ignored the "hype" and "viral" marketing. All I care about is the final product, not the BS marketing. And I don't scour the Earth for every little detail and clue about what to expect beforehand. Patience is indeed, a virtue.
  • William
    Just some quick questions. Is the monster terrifying? Does it have crappy SciFi animation? Do you get close to where you see every detail or like Hank Azara's close-up with Godzilla in Godzilla? Is this movie scary?
  • Trebek
    Awesome...I figured this movie would be OK at best, and so far it's hard to tell if its crap or if its ok, judging by peoples comments...Seems like you either hate it or love it. I have a feeling I might hate it...
  • Jeff Nyman
    Here's one person's view:

    I wouldn't say the film was overhyped necessarily because unless you frequent sites like this one, it's very possible you didn't hear of this film until the trailers started appearing on TV. I know many people who didn't see any of the so-called "viral marketing."

    Basically, I liked this movie because I accepted it for what it was.

    Yes, some aspects of the film were a little annoying. The way the camera work was done was silly at some points. It's not the fact that the movie uses the "from a camera" viewpoint. I was okay with that. (I think it can actually add realism to a film like this.) But we're supposed to believe that this guy -- even at the beginning, could never keep the camera on people's faces. The dialogue was useless for the most part. Granted, if this was really happening the dialogue probably would be composed mostly of screams or of "DON'T!" or "GO! GO!" But the problem is: this isn't *really* happening. It's a movie. I don't want to see how people would "really" act if a monster came to New York. I want to see an entertaining movie that knows when and where to suspend realism and when and where not to.

    For example, without giving a lot away at all, why would an Army evacuation put one girl on a helicopter (and she was healthy) while leaving a very wounded one behind? You might say: "Well, who cares?" Okay, but the fact that this kind of stuff is so noticeable means that you get separated from the story for a bit. Your suspension of disbelief gets halted. And that's a bad thing. When coupled with the almost total lack of emotional engagement possible with the characters (who are largely cardboard), you don't have much except the disaster itself.

    And this is a disaster movie first and foremost. Now, I feel the scenes of disaster are *very* well done. That's what this movie really is: it's not about a monster, it's not about the people. It's not even about how people respond to a disaster. It's about filming a disaster scenario, pure and simple. A monster just happens to be the means by which it occurs. Someone said this was a reinvention of the monster movie. To me, that's hardly the case. What "Cloverfield" was is simply the disaster movie done (again!) in New York (again!) with a monster in some updated "clothing," so to speak. There is literally nothing new here at all.

    The camcorder stuff? Done in Blair Witch and also with Diary of the Dead. It's arguable if it's an effective way to tell a story, but it's certainly not new and certainly not groundbreaking. A monster in New York? Not new, not groundbreaking. Scenes of destruction? Not new, not groundbreaking (even though they were well done). The characters are mainly a foil to take us on a tour of New York as it is attacked.

    So, really, this is lipstick on a pig. It just happens to be a pig that many of us like (intense disaster scenarios where people have to run for their lives amidst chaos and calamity). If you are a critical moviegoer who cares about plotting and dialogue over and above the "fun" of a disaster movie, you probably won't like this. If you are a critical moviegoer who can put the "fun" part above the other elements, you'll probably take this for what it is and enjoy it. If you're an uncritical moviegoer, who doesn't notice plot gaps or poor storytelling but revels in pure action, you'll probably really love this film.
  • Grub
    The monster is not terrifying in the least, the parasites look like big spiders, there is a close-up, which satisfies the curiosity as to what it looks like, and no the movie is not even close to scary...in the end I would not call it a horror movie or a monster movie...it would probably fall more under documantary or drama???
  • William
    how close is the close up excatly?
  • Grub
    Like all up in your face up-close, from Hud's perspective. Close enough to smell the stank on his breath.
  • jay jay the jetplane
    im really confused on whether ill like it, or i wont. theres alot of comments that hated the movie, and alot of comments that liked it. somebody please just answer these questions without spoiling the movie for me...do you get to see the monster in full detail (without smoke or blurryness and shit), and does the monster fuck some shit up? just somebody answer those questions for me.
  • Matt
    I can't wait til Friday ... but I notice that all the "haters" of the movie are missing the point! They are complaining that there is no plot and the camera is shaky. From what I am learning one of the purposes of the movie is to make it as real as possible. The movie is suuposed to be a tape that was found off the street somewhere, so all the plot talk is not going to work.

    Let me explain further, "a monster some 50 stories tall has just thrown the head of the Statue of Liberty down my street, so.... I would like to take this time to tell you where I am from, where I went to school, my mom and dad's name, my social security number, the name of my cat, how tall my girlfriend is, how my 16th birthday sucked, and how good that ice cream I had last night was."

    No! People I am high stepping it out of the NYC! Peace! Of course it is not totally realistic, because I am not so sure too many people would take the time to record such an event. Me, maybe I would get one shot, but after that I'm ditching the cam and haulin some you know what! That is what really intrigues me about this film, how realistic can they make it.
  • Cap'n Pugwash
    If you thought those characters were relatable then you need new friends

    That is a fact.

    This stank.

    Reminds everyone why Starship Troopers and Aliens are so cool.
  • Lambert
    Okay - my brother and I came in 15 minutes before the premiere started so only the first four rows had empty seats. That was a BIG mistake. The only way to appreciate this movie is to sit as far away from the screen as possible because a lot of the handheld shots were extreme close-ups of the characters' faces. The rest of the scenes are dizzying, angled, sometimes blurry, inadequately lit, pans and zooms. It's too realistic and I don't mean that in a positive way. While the style is deliberate, in the end that's what this movie is about - style. I'm sure that the CG animators and Compositors spent a lot of time creating sequences with this very unpolished look. The result is really convincing as if this was an actual footage recovered from the ruins in Manhattan. Don't expect any explanations about the creature's origins though - there are no whys or hows in this movie. It's simply a succession of unedited shots showing what "actually" happened from the point of view of an "amateur" videographer. Think Blair Witch Project meets 9-11. No Godzilla here, at least not onscreen. Out of the 80 minutes that you`ll be spending inside the theater, you`ll only see the giant creature for, at the most, 3 minutes total - and these are mere glimpses and not full-on shots. I left the theater feeling disappointed to say the least.
  • rusydi
    already saw the movie......very dissapointed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Cameron
    Ignoring the ending I thought this was a really amazing imaginative monster movie. The Cinema Verte didn't bother me save for a minute or two about a quarter of the way through. Having Hud as comedic relief was a stroke of genius in my opinion and added alot to the film and made it much more entertaining without detracting from the films core. The sound was fantastic and there are a couple of scenes which really took my breath away. For example the helicopter scene and the first bit after it were just amazing.

    ***Time to Talk about the ending***

    I'm really conflicted about this. I mean it just leaves you feeling dead inside haha. I must admit I did feel a more "hollywood ending" may have improved it, or at least something that gave the film some scope, hell even a final shot of NY being blow to bits I think somehow would have helped.

    In a way I felt the ending was almost too real for me, blah to confuzzled by this at least it wasn't a film ruining I Am legend conclusion

    **************

    In any case definately, definately worth the ticket and definately, definately worth going and seeing on the big screen!
  • cloversux
    DEFINATELY one of the WORST movie seen ever! Everybody came out of the cinema cursing and swearing.... not to mention, wanting to THROW UP! From the starting of the movie, the way its filmed makes the audiences feel dizzy... and that continued for the rest of the movie.

    Ended adruptly with no ending, started with no good beginning too. Really disliked the plot of the movie and especially the filming. It reminds me of a HOME VIDEO instead of a movie.

    Mainly could remember the main lines being :" Oh my god.....oh my god...... oh god.......oh god......"
    "I know....... I know....... "
    "run.........run........."

    Seriously, the worst movie ever!
  • SD
    Great reviews.. NOT! However. I will see it tonight at midnight JUST BECAUSE it's something fun to do.. something out of the "ordinary" and needless to say something that has been building since July.

    I didn't even want to read any reviews but I could not help myself.. LOL.. Here I am... BUT.. Oh well!

    Sharon
  • Frank
    The movie has a 71% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes, needless to say many of these negative reviews are just haters who have not even seen the movie
  • Dan
    People are blasting it for the style it was set in...


    Take the movie for what it is. It is a monster/disaster movie filmed from the perspective of people trying to rescue a friend and gtfo of the city. Character development? They are RUNNING for their LIVES from a MONSTER.

    If you didn't like the camera shake, what were you expecting? The whole movie is set like that, you knew that from the previews. How steady would you hold a camera running? Have you even tried it?

    The answer is not steady at all. Take the movie for what it is, not compare it to what it isn't.
  • Hmmm
    ROOOOOOOOOOOOOAR...WASTE YOUR MONEY....ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAR!!!
  • ericscam2
    Saw a screening. Wish I could say it was good, alas, its Godzilla with FX. Stupid, clumsy, oddly uninvolving, stilted acting, embarrassing dialogue, essentially a stupid, clunky mess for anyone over the age of 14.

    Go rent any one of the Godzilla movies, or better yet, the original King Kong...far far FAR better.
blog comments powered by Disqus