Warner Bros to Make Eighth Harry Potter Movie?!

Harry Potter

The UK’s Mail on Sunday is reporting that the big screen adaptation of the seventh and final Harry Potter novel, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, may be split into two separate films. This decision is an artistic one, rather than financial.

Deathly Hallows is 784 pages in length, compared to the first few books in the series which were less than half the length. I, along with most fans of the book series were rather surprised that Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix had not been split into two films. Goblet was over 700 pages, while Order neared the 900 page mark. I think both of the films suffered from plot compression, over exhausting viewers who had not previously consumed the book versions. I applaud Warner Bros for finally taking this leap, if only it could have happened a bit sooner. It’s too bad that the studio didn’t at least allow production of extra scenes and sequences for a super extended versions on DVD (ala Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings Extended Editions).

  • Danatic
    This is what I hoped they had done with all of them! Now are they gonna be the same team for each or are they gonna change up directors and stuff?
  • Jamie
    Smart decision but tricky in marketing, which is why they didn't do it earlier.
  • best. idea. ever.
  • Robert
    I concur. I mean, I personally could sit through a four+ hour HP movie (especially if Alfonso Cauron was behind the wheel), but I don't expect most could/would.
  • Meli
    Should they decide to split it into two movies
    my hope is they film them at the same time, so
    that we don't have to wait more than a year
    for the conclusion. Though waiting an extra year
    is the one thing that bums me out, but for a good
    end battle scene it will be worth it.
  • Connor
    I don't think splitting them up is a good idea, and although it would solve the time issue, it would create a lot more problems. I personally don't see what the problem is with a long movie, I love long movies! I felt dissapointed by how much they compressed Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix (the latter moreso than the former) and I think fans of the Harry Potter book series, and movie series wouldn't mind if they were longer, if they included everything. Heck, I sat through Return of the King twice in a row it was so epic.
  • Steffie
    I think this wasn't the smartest decision ever; what cliffhanger could you add to the first part of book seven? Harry Potter consists out of one, clear line: Summer, school, conflict, back to the Dursleys.
    If you cut it in half, the whole plot-line collapses!
    I don't agree with this decision at all!
  • james
    I think this is a rather weird decision.I mean are the going to cliff hang it or are they going to make it a differnt story from the book.
  • james
    And one last thing they should have done this with lord of the rings
  • Christian
    I agree with this decision! Not only will the film be rich with details from the book but it will be much better made than the Order of the Phoenix. I am gravely disappointed though about the movement of Half- Blood Prince since it was going to be on my B-Day. However, I think that the gap between the two final films should not be that long. It will ruin the effect from the first film.
  • MCKENNA
    I WOULD LOVE JK ROWLING TO MAKE ANOTHER BOOK AND MOVIE I THINK IT WOULD BE GREAT! AND I WOULDNT MIND SITTING THROUGH A 4 HOUR MOVIE FOR HARRY POTTER!
blog comments powered by Disqus