<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sneak Peak: Neil Gaiman&#8217;s Coraline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-447418</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-447418</guid>
		<description>The reason I enjoy Gaiman's work- beyond just the Sandman- is that as your read them you can see the movie playing out in your mind. He writes like he's creating a script. I can always see the way the stories would unfold like a movie. I guess all books are suppose to in some way do that. I've never experienced it quite the way I do when I read Neil Gaiman's stories. Mirror Mask I find to be incredible. I think its a style that you have to like- and it won't appeal to everyone, but that's a good thing. If he was liked by everyone he'd be pretty boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I enjoy Gaiman&#8217;s work- beyond just the Sandman- is that as your read them you can see the movie playing out in your mind. He writes like he&#8217;s creating a script. I can always see the way the stories would unfold like a movie. I guess all books are suppose to in some way do that. I&#8217;ve never experienced it quite the way I do when I read Neil Gaiman&#8217;s stories. Mirror Mask I find to be incredible. I think its a style that you have to like- and it won&#8217;t appeal to everyone, but that&#8217;s a good thing. If he was liked by everyone he&#8217;d be pretty boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweet baby</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-161448</link>
		<dc:creator>sweet baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-161448</guid>
		<description>wow i love the book coraline it rocks dude i luv it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow i love the book coraline it rocks dude i luv it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kestrel</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-150326</link>
		<dc:creator>Kestrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 19:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-150326</guid>
		<description>I just saw Stardust last night, and I was amazed at how good it was. . . I mean it looked like a listless fantasy flop when it came out. . . but I was suprised at how well it was done on several different levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw Stardust last night, and I was amazed at how good it was. . . I mean it looked like a listless fantasy flop when it came out. . . but I was suprised at how well it was done on several different levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uruloki :: Blog &#187; Felices Fiestas desde Uruloki y unas noticias para completar el d&#237;a. Arte conceptual de Hulk, 2 minutos de Coraline, spots de Cloverfield a.k.a. Monstruoso, etc&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-150000</link>
		<dc:creator>Uruloki :: Blog &#187; Felices Fiestas desde Uruloki y unas noticias para completar el d&#237;a. Arte conceptual de Hulk, 2 minutos de Coraline, spots de Cloverfield a.k.a. Monstruoso, etc&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-150000</guid>
		<description>[...] material de sobra para esperar con los brazos abiertos este curioso proyecto. Por otro lado, y gracias a Slash Films, podemos echar un primer breve vistazo a Coraline (2008) de Henry Selick, la adaptaci&#243;n al [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] material de sobra para esperar con los brazos abiertos este curioso proyecto. Por otro lado, y gracias a Slash Films, podemos echar un primer breve vistazo a Coraline (2008) de Henry Selick, la adaptaci&oacute;n al [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148759</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148759</guid>
		<description>I absolutely adore the novel Coraline, but I'm not a big fan of the clip I just saw. I think the story would have been much more intriguing and less comical/wacky in live-action, but that's just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely adore the novel Coraline, but I&#8217;m not a big fan of the clip I just saw. I think the story would have been much more intriguing and less comical/wacky in live-action, but that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korskarn</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148758</link>
		<dc:creator>Korskarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148758</guid>
		<description>Following on from Gabe K.'s comment, I feel that the problem with Neil Gaiman's movies is the medium - he's a fantastic prose writer because he understands the material and writes scenes with lots of subtext.  However, he doesn't create strong characters or dialogue - it's very difficult to connect with any of his characters because they only outwardly display very basic emotions and responses, and he doesn't give a lot of insight as to what they're thinking or feeling internally.

I would argue that the one character that he's had the most success with is Death, and that's primarily because it was such an original anthropomorphism.  I would also argue that the titular Sandman of the famous graphic novels was merely a MacGuffin to write about The Dreaming.  It tends to be his highly stylized fantasy settings that captures the interest of readers rather than the actual characters within them.

Unfortunately screenplays tend to revolve around character and dialogue.  In this medium, all the nuance that he typically packs into a scene has to be converted to a form that's unfamiliar for him.  The result is that his subtext becomes supertext - one of the more noticeable examples of this was in Beowulf when Hrothgar offers the dragon horn as a reward for defeating Grendel, saying "She will be yours forever" while Wealthow stands in the foreground.  It's clumsy phrasing used to bludgeon a point home to the audience (and it doesn't help that Robert Zemeckis is not the most subtle of directors either).

I'm hoping that it's just a matter of finding his rhythm and the right creative talents to work with, but since three of his projects have been flawed (although still acceptable) I'm starting to wonder if he's simply not very good at it.  In which case the best option would be to let someone who understands the source material adapt it for him (although I could understand his reluctance given what's happened in the past with adaptations of Alan Moore's works).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following on from Gabe K.&#8217;s comment, I feel that the problem with Neil Gaiman&#8217;s movies is the medium - he&#8217;s a fantastic prose writer because he understands the material and writes scenes with lots of subtext.  However, he doesn&#8217;t create strong characters or dialogue - it&#8217;s very difficult to connect with any of his characters because they only outwardly display very basic emotions and responses, and he doesn&#8217;t give a lot of insight as to what they&#8217;re thinking or feeling internally.</p>
<p>I would argue that the one character that he&#8217;s had the most success with is Death, and that&#8217;s primarily because it was such an original anthropomorphism.  I would also argue that the titular Sandman of the famous graphic novels was merely a MacGuffin to write about The Dreaming.  It tends to be his highly stylized fantasy settings that captures the interest of readers rather than the actual characters within them.</p>
<p>Unfortunately screenplays tend to revolve around character and dialogue.  In this medium, all the nuance that he typically packs into a scene has to be converted to a form that&#8217;s unfamiliar for him.  The result is that his subtext becomes supertext - one of the more noticeable examples of this was in Beowulf when Hrothgar offers the dragon horn as a reward for defeating Grendel, saying &#8220;She will be yours forever&#8221; while Wealthow stands in the foreground.  It&#8217;s clumsy phrasing used to bludgeon a point home to the audience (and it doesn&#8217;t help that Robert Zemeckis is not the most subtle of directors either).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that it&#8217;s just a matter of finding his rhythm and the right creative talents to work with, but since three of his projects have been flawed (although still acceptable) I&#8217;m starting to wonder if he&#8217;s simply not very good at it.  In which case the best option would be to let someone who understands the source material adapt it for him (although I could understand his reluctance given what&#8217;s happened in the past with adaptations of Alan Moore&#8217;s works).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sciretta</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148757</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sciretta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148757</guid>
		<description>Ary,

I know this, but for someone who is not a fan, it's not worth the investment of a huge hardcover book to find out if I like the series. It's a shame that they are waiting to suck all the money out of the Gaiman fans before releasing the re-colored editions in softcover</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ary,</p>
<p>I know this, but for someone who is not a fan, it&#8217;s not worth the investment of a huge hardcover book to find out if I like the series. It&#8217;s a shame that they are waiting to suck all the money out of the Gaiman fans before releasing the re-colored editions in softcover</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ary</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148751</link>
		<dc:creator>Ary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148751</guid>
		<description>"I have tried to pick up Sandman countless times, but the quality of the coloring on the art has always turned me offâ€¦"

You'll be happy to know that the early issues did have legitimate coloring issues, and they have re-colored the stories recently for the huge hard cover Absolute editions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have tried to pick up Sandman countless times, but the quality of the coloring on the art has always turned me offâ€¦&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be happy to know that the early issues did have legitimate coloring issues, and they have re-colored the stories recently for the huge hard cover Absolute editions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranting Animator</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148716</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranting Animator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148716</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, it's "Coraline" not "Caroline."

A friend of mine is one of the lead story artists on this project, and he's quite excited by it. He's a typically cynical animation pro - damn hard to impress - so if he's charged up there must be something to it. We can hope!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, it&#8217;s &#8220;Coraline&#8221; not &#8220;Caroline.&#8221;</p>
<p>A friend of mine is one of the lead story artists on this project, and he&#8217;s quite excited by it. He&#8217;s a typically cynical animation pro - damn hard to impress - so if he&#8217;s charged up there must be something to it. We can hope!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr B</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148708</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148708</guid>
		<description>While the strike is on all of his new film projects have come to a stop. He is masterful when it comes to the short story, and American Gods works well because of this ability, as does Sandman. A recent re-release of The Sandman series is slowly coming out and the coloring has been reworked. The series was started in the 80's so they didn't have the coloring and artwork technology we have today. But it's not really any worse than Watchmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the strike is on all of his new film projects have come to a stop. He is masterful when it comes to the short story, and American Gods works well because of this ability, as does Sandman. A recent re-release of The Sandman series is slowly coming out and the coloring has been reworked. The series was started in the 80&#8217;s so they didn&#8217;t have the coloring and artwork technology we have today. But it&#8217;s not really any worse than Watchmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe K.</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148658</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148658</guid>
		<description>I am unabashedly a fan of Gaiman. That said, I've seen a couple of his movies and as much as it pains me to say this, they haven't blown me away either. Gaiman is a master when it comes to wordsmithing, and if you were to pick up American Gods or Anansi Boys, you may agree. The Sandman series is considered his finest achievement, and I'm not going to argue that. I understand that the coloring is a bit uninspired, but if you look past that, you'll find yourself wrapped up in a world that's full of wonder and horror.

I think it goes without saying that writing comics/novels is obviously a completely different animal than screenwriting and moviemaking. If I had to guess, I'd say that Gaiman is in the process of learning to transfer his skills to the screen. It'll be interesting to see what happens when he finally starts making Death: The High Cost of Living (a very popular 3-issue comic off-shoot of Sandman). He's spoken about making it, but I haven't seen nor heard of any confirmation that it's being done. I believe in due time, Gaiman will find his voice in movies and hopefully blow us away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unabashedly a fan of Gaiman. That said, I&#8217;ve seen a couple of his movies and as much as it pains me to say this, they haven&#8217;t blown me away either. Gaiman is a master when it comes to wordsmithing, and if you were to pick up American Gods or Anansi Boys, you may agree. The Sandman series is considered his finest achievement, and I&#8217;m not going to argue that. I understand that the coloring is a bit uninspired, but if you look past that, you&#8217;ll find yourself wrapped up in a world that&#8217;s full of wonder and horror.</p>
<p>I think it goes without saying that writing comics/novels is obviously a completely different animal than screenwriting and moviemaking. If I had to guess, I&#8217;d say that Gaiman is in the process of learning to transfer his skills to the screen. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens when he finally starts making Death: The High Cost of Living (a very popular 3-issue comic off-shoot of Sandman). He&#8217;s spoken about making it, but I haven&#8217;t seen nor heard of any confirmation that it&#8217;s being done. I believe in due time, Gaiman will find his voice in movies and hopefully blow us away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Langdon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148631</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Langdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148631</guid>
		<description>"Neil Gaiman has yet to really impress me .. I just donâ€™t understand the huge cult following behind the projects that he creates. I have yet to read a comic or novel written by Gaiman..."

That's an odd statement.  Sort of like someone saying they don't understand why Stephen King is popular because you don't like his movies, but have never read his books.  The Cult of Gaiman has nothing to do with his movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Neil Gaiman has yet to really impress me .. I just donâ€™t understand the huge cult following behind the projects that he creates. I have yet to read a comic or novel written by Gaiman&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an odd statement.  Sort of like someone saying they don&#8217;t understand why Stephen King is popular because you don&#8217;t like his movies, but have never read his books.  The Cult of Gaiman has nothing to do with his movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sciretta</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148584</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sciretta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148584</guid>
		<description>I have tried to pick up Sandman countless times, but the quality of the coloring on the art has always turned me off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried to pick up Sandman countless times, but the quality of the coloring on the art has always turned me off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ary</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148577</link>
		<dc:creator>Ary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/12/22/sneak-peak-neil-gaimans-caroline/#comment-148577</guid>
		<description>I don't know if it'll be your cup of tea, but Sandman is really the primary reason why I'm crazy about Gaiman. It's really one of the finest achievements in the fantasy genre ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;ll be your cup of tea, but Sandman is really the primary reason why I&#8217;m crazy about Gaiman. It&#8217;s really one of the finest achievements in the fantasy genre ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
