Comments on: Terminator 4 Details Revealed

By: Simon

Simon — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:28:17 +0000

I’d say the effects will be awesome, but as for the story line its sounding a little weak at the moment, but I guess I’ll wait for more info before I crack the shits… hahha

By: Movie Make-out » Sam Worthington to star in Terminator 4

Movie Make-out » Sam Worthington to star in Terminator 4 — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:44:17 +0000

[...] being personally recommended to director McG by Cameron himself. The role of Marcus has previously described as the main character in the new Terminator: Salvation trilogy, a "bad ass [...]

By: bbmark

bbmark — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:26:20 +0000

B-Sol,
Schwarzenegger was a T-800, not a T-100. so it makes sense for there to be T-600s

but anyway McG is crap and crap comes from crap. sooooo…..

….yeah prolly gonna suck. but i’m hopeful though

By: B-Sol

B-Sol — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:48:28 +0000

How would there be T-600 models in this movie if it takes place 15 years before the future of the first movie, which featured T-100s?

By: Conozcan algunos detalles de ‘Terminator 4′ — CINERAMA > ReseÃ±as de cine

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:28:28 +0000

[...] Via | /Film [...]

By: Meli

Meli — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:58:01 +0000

Why the fuck put the Terminator title to this movie? This outline sounds like shit and personally I lost all hope the minute they hired McG to direct the flick. I really hate that Christian Bale is going to be in this…he’s one of my favorites, but I don’t if I’ll be able to stop this movie when it’s released.

By: BxA

BxA — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:58:05 +0000

Welp…
im not going to see it.

By: TheDohDoh

TheDohDoh — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:48:45 +0000

What’s all the fuss? Conner has been rumored to be a side player in the new trilogy for quite a while, and again he’ll take a greater role in the last two films.

The info is hewre nor there. you can’t stretch the premise of John vs Terminators over three huge $150 mill a piece flicks. New characters must be brought into canon for this to work.

Sounds epic. My only hope is that they are rated-R. The apocalypse ain’t pretty.

By: Mel Valentin

Mel Valentin — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:22:45 +0000

Mr. Sciretta, how good is Devin’s information? Is it rock-solid or is it possible that some of this information is conjecture. Ok, I know I can check CHUD, but I’m more curious about Devin’s track record when it comes to plot details of as-yet-unreleased-unproduced films.

If his information pans out, then I’m with the other posters: pushing John Conner (JC anyone?) to a secondary or background character makes next to no sense. I’d need to lear a lot more before I gave the producers and McG the benefit of the doubt here.

By: roman

roman — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:35:19 +0000

Seriously, if it was (almost) anybody but McG I might be excited about this. But his involvement just kills it. A visionary could pull together and shine despite the hack-work of low-rent screenwriting-by-committee. But McG, as will be his legacy, only makes bad worse.

By: alpha

alpha — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:34:28 +0000

what about vin diesel? do you have any information Peter?

By: Jerry Butler

Jerry Butler — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:21:46 +0000

^ Actually, this is like deciding to make a 4th Batman movie, but having it suddenly focus around a some guy named Marcus who goes around kicking Gotham badguy ass.

Seems they may by trying to play towards the younger generation with this. Do young kids care about Terminator? I thought it was just us 30 something’s who’ve been waiting 20+ years to see Reese’s flash-back/forward? war scenes elongated into an entire movie.

By: Pat

Pat — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:54:06 +0000

wth! How is Conner NOT the main character!? That’s like deciding to make a 4th new batman movie but having Robin be the main character and leaving Bats in the background.

By: Orange cinema

Orange cinema — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:36:06 +0000

stmirza: lmao! Well put my friend!I had mentioned before that I was hoping for good writers, and it looks like we are doomed. I too will be self-dick-kicking.

By: StMirhza

StMirhza — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:14:31 +0000

Wow,
Literally everything about these projects suck.
The writers are awful. A sample of their past work: Catwoman, Primeval, The Net 2.0… whatever the fuck that is. Most of this other shit sounds like straight -to-video drivel.

And fucking McG? Really? That’s the guy they pick to resurrect one of the best action franchises ever? Come on! Fuck me. This is going to be painful because I know I’ll see all three in theaters and want to kick myself in the dick for doing it. Unfortunately kicking oneself in the dick is impossible, so I will be doubly frustrated.

By: NC

NC — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:06:38 +0000

Sounds good to me..so far. Not enough info yet to make any snap judgements about it. My fingers are crossed.

By: WS

WS — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:36:33 +0000

What????? Puhleeasse!!!

By: » Otros detalles Terminator 4

» Otros detalles Terminator 4 — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:09:46 +0000

[...] Via | Slashfilm [...]

By: hk

hk — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:10:09 +0000

Well, the title may suck but at least the concept sounds stupid.

Oh, wait a minute…

By: Orange cinema

Orange cinema — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:30:46 +0000

uhh, conner is NOT the main character?! I’m not gonna talk too much shit just yet, but 1st McG, and now the savior of our planet in a secondary (or less) role? Whats the point of a 20 year character build-up, only to ignore it when he rises to the ultimate challenge? And not utilizing Bale as much as they can? Again, I will see the films, but this is not off to a good start. I think I might be less skeptical w a better director, but we can always hope for an excellent scribe.