<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jason Reitman Reteams with Diablo Cody on Jennifer&#8217;s Body</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 05:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-398260</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-398260</guid>
		<description>Thank You For Smoking was a wicked book. There's no way they could go wrong.

Juno, on the other hand, don't even get me started. Suffice it to say, I have my problems with that movie and its script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You For Smoking was a wicked book. There&#8217;s no way they could go wrong.</p>
<p>Juno, on the other hand, don&#8217;t even get me started. Suffice it to say, I have my problems with that movie and its script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wandabel</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-338748</link>
		<dc:creator>wandabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 07:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-338748</guid>
		<description>diablo cody is a terrible writer, this is going to a terible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>diablo cody is a terrible writer, this is going to a terible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-113180</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-113180</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that people have just forgotten the past ever happened, and have no real concept of what "good" or "original" actually is. 

Thank you for Smoking was OK at best. Mostly because of the acting. But it was NOT exceptional by any standards. And I would bet money Juno is even less so. These films will quickly be forgotton. Flavors of the week. But then I suppose alot of people do want the same thing over and over, just in a different package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that people have just forgotten the past ever happened, and have no real concept of what &#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;original&#8221; actually is. </p>
<p>Thank you for Smoking was OK at best. Mostly because of the acting. But it was NOT exceptional by any standards. And I would bet money Juno is even less so. These films will quickly be forgotton. Flavors of the week. But then I suppose alot of people do want the same thing over and over, just in a different package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-112573</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-112573</guid>
		<description>Megan Fox is a terrible, terrible actress.  If she is headlining this flick, count me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megan Fox is a terrible, terrible actress.  If she is headlining this flick, count me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheDohDoh</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-112313</link>
		<dc:creator>TheDohDoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-112313</guid>
		<description>After TYFS and Juno, I have the highest faith in Reitman - who seems to be aware of the mistakes his father has made (not knocking Ivan though) and aware of what comedy needs right now - originality. 

I highly doubt that Diablo and Reitman would proceed with a film if they didn't think they could make gangbusters, in terms of creative spark and box office. These two have the world in their hands now and they are both smart enough to know it. They both know the difficulty of dark comedy, and even more, horror comedy, so Idle Hands this will not be (not to knock Idle Hands, it was underrated). 

I think Diablo is going after the Cherished '80s with a vengeance, with Juno being our generation's Fast Times, and she's quoted as loving Rosemary's Baby, so the girl knows female horror.  

As for Megan Fox, she's the new Phoebe Cates and nothing more. Personally, I find her exponentially more appealing as a body and as an actress (lick! smile!) than Jessica Biehl (boring) and Alba (talentless, obnoxious).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After TYFS and Juno, I have the highest faith in Reitman - who seems to be aware of the mistakes his father has made (not knocking Ivan though) and aware of what comedy needs right now - originality. </p>
<p>I highly doubt that Diablo and Reitman would proceed with a film if they didn&#8217;t think they could make gangbusters, in terms of creative spark and box office. These two have the world in their hands now and they are both smart enough to know it. They both know the difficulty of dark comedy, and even more, horror comedy, so Idle Hands this will not be (not to knock Idle Hands, it was underrated). </p>
<p>I think Diablo is going after the Cherished &#8217;80s with a vengeance, with Juno being our generation&#8217;s Fast Times, and she&#8217;s quoted as loving Rosemary&#8217;s Baby, so the girl knows female horror.  </p>
<p>As for Megan Fox, she&#8217;s the new Phoebe Cates and nothing more. Personally, I find her exponentially more appealing as a body and as an actress (lick! smile!) than Jessica Biehl (boring) and Alba (talentless, obnoxious).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Time &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick Dose: &#8216;Kill Bill&#8217; parody, &#8216;Trek&#8217; pics, more - thev247.com</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-112126</link>
		<dc:creator>Screen Time &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick Dose: &#8216;Kill Bill&#8217; parody, &#8216;Trek&#8217; pics, more - thev247.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-112126</guid>
		<description>[...] The team behind critical darling &#8220;Juno&#8221; has a new project in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The team behind critical darling &#8220;Juno&#8221; has a new project in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-112080</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/11/13/jason-reitman-reteams-with-diablo-cody-on-jennifers-body/#comment-112080</guid>
		<description>she's still writing? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she&#8217;s still writing? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
