Half Movie Screens To Be Digital By 2013

Half Movie Screens to be digital by 2013

Hollywood and Theater owners are betting on Digital 3D to save the declining in-theater business. And with the biggest release in digital 3D on the horizon (more on Beowulf later), all the buzz seems to be on this new technology. Dreamworks Animation has vowed to release all of its computer animated films in 3D starting in 2009. Studio head Jeffrey Katzenberg predicts 12-18 3D movies per year in 2010. And now Variety is reporting that half of all the worldwide screens will be digital in 2013. George Lucas’ vision is starting to become a reality 15 years too late.

This year has seen an explosion in digital conversion with 4,627 screens, 5% of the global total, switched to digital up to September. Penetration is deepest in the U.S., home to 78% of the world’s digital screens. The U.K. and South Korea boast the second and third most digital screens.

And the promise of 3D profits are fueling this new interest in digital film. I do see the value in a 3D presentation, but will it lose it’s value when the films become less event-worthy? Do we really need 18 3D movies per year? And do you really need to see a 3D movie in the crappy movie theater down the street? This is yet to be seen. One thing is for sure, independent film is sure to benefit in the long run. Distribution has always been a high cost for smaller movies. When digital distribution becomes the norm, the way movies are screened will change more dramatically than anyone thinks, including the theater owners. Theatrical screenings will become on demand, and the audience will again regain the cinema for themselves.

photo: Flickr

  • TheDohDoh
    Great insight on the digital distribution revolution. I agree 100% with this being under the radar, eclipsed by the pop novelty of 3D cinema. Entertainment Weekly should definitely have this topic on their cover by now. It's the same thing that happened to music, in a way. Imagine theaters using a legal Napster to play films and you start to realize the possibilities - older films of all kinds, from Treasure of the Sierra Madre to 80s slashers would theoretically be on call 24-7 to theater owners and even drive-ins. Indie films totally benefit, just like Indie bands have benefitted from itunes and even OiNK. Theaters will become an unbelievable nickalodeon of possibilities and genres, and I for one, don't think this is too good to be true. It will be great for theaters and movie audiences in the too often maligned fly-over-states as well, who will finally get the art house experience and variety of Manhattan and LA.

    As for 3D film, I think we are underestimating it. Like graphic novels or video games, we relate it to drunken 20somethings, when more audiences of all kinds will love this format. 3D cinema can benefit serious films, not just pop cult fantasias like Beowulf (still, Beowulf is going to be awesome). Imagine what 2001 or even Eyes Wide Shut would have been like had Kubrick optimized them for 3D. Unlike virtual reality, 3D has the potential to strenghten film as a whole and produce unforeseen quality. The vicarious-sword-fighter aspect is a misconception and the fear/slighting of the new should be realized for what it is. Hell, I'm up for a worldwide alternative to popcorn already. The movie going experience is too often abotu nostalgia, when it needs a modern update. Also, 3D movies will seemingly do away with people texting and cell phoning. Wishful thinking. ;)
  • I'm torn on this whole 3D fad. On the one hand, it should be a great experience, but then, that's all it is - an experience. Studios should attract movie-goers through compelling stories and characters - not gimmicks. Are we sacrificing quality for spectacle?
  • TheDohDoh
    @Clint, Couldn't you make the same spectacle-over-story trend for movies in general? I doubt that 3D will tip the scale even more. We'll still have Transformers, Die Hards, Terminators, and Hit Mans as well as our Junos with 3D/digital films. You can't fight technology. Unlike 3D in the past, there is a helluva lot more promise this go around. We'll definitely see an Oscar picture/Oscar director take advantage of the 3D "experience" to offer a great story, it's just a matter of time. And if it looks cooler and offers something akin to LSD, so be it.
  • dan
    Obviously...
  • I agree. We already have "blockbusters" that sacrifice story for special effects. It will just be interesting to see how 3D progresses. Will studios be so eager to crank out films on 3D that they focus more and more on special effects over time and less and less on stories, or will they be able to maintain some balance?
  • Digital AND 3D? Man, that can make the movie theatre more like live theatre.
  • Jay08
    Bad move.
    1. Nothing is better than film.
    2. See #1.
  • I like it.
blog comments powered by Disqus