The Green Lantern Gets a Director

Greg Berlanti directs The Green Lantern

Yesterday we reported that David Dobkin (Fred Claus) had signed on to direct a big screen adaptation of The Flash comic book. Dobkin revealed that his film would be set in the same universe as the Justice League of America movie which is now being cast. This brought us to the conclusion that Warner Bros is hoping to quickly capitalize on the success of the superhero team-up film, with a new solo franchise. Well it now appears that The Flash is not the only film getting a fast track into production.

Greg Berlanti (The Broken Hearts Club) has signed on to direct a live-action big screen adaptation of The Green Lantern. Berlanti is penning the script with Marc Guggenheim and Michael Green. So what else has Berlanti done? He executive produced Dirty Sexy Money, Everwood, and Brothers & Sisters. But Warner Bros is saying “Who cares if his only experience is a $1 million indie romantic comedy, he could probably handle a big screen superhero film!” Are they on crack? I was a little miffed when David Dobkin announced his Flash plans yesterday, but at least he has a filmography. Sure they were comedies, but he can make a movie, if anything, I know that. But the Berlanti is very perplexing to me. Variety sheds some light on how Berlanti may have earned this gig:

“Guggenheim, who works with Berlanti as a writer-producer on Brothers & Sisters, wrote the Marvel comicbooks Amazing Spider-Man, Wolverine and Blade. Green, the “Heroes” co-exec producer who worked with Berlanti on Everwood and Jack & Bobby, wrote the Marvel Comics title Superman/Batman and was a writer-producer on Smallville.”

Networking (Who you know) trumps talent or experience in Hollywood. Apparently, Berlanti met with DC Comics senior vice president Gregory Noveck a year ago about bringing Green Lantern to the big screen.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not against Warner Bros making a Green Lantern film, or a Flash movie for that matter, I just want them to be done right. Because if a film like Daredevil teaches us anything, it is that a movie studio will only give a franchise one chance (Of course, The Incredible Hulk and The Fantastic Four might be the only exceptions).

The Hollywood Reporter has the following quote from Greg:

“To me, this was on the last great comic book movie that hasn’t been made,” said Berlanti, who grew up reading comics in the 1980s. “It was a comic book with a real mythology that you would see in a lot of the space operas and the sci-fi books. The best part about it, anybody can be become one of the Green Lanterns because anyone can end up with that ring.” “The danger and the fear from a lot of people is that it would be silly. In these post-’Harry Potter’ and ‘Lord of the Rings’ days, it’s not any more fantastical than that. It’s taken movies like that to make it feel as if a Green Lantern film is possible.”

With The Flash and The Green Lantern spin-off movies in the works, it makes me seriously wonder if Warner Bros will announce that the Bryan Singer’s Superman sequel, The Man of Steel, is no more. It seems to me that the studio sees more benefit in a Superman film, which is an offshoot of the Justice League movie.

The Green Lantern character was created by writer Bill Finger and artist Martin Nodell in All-American Comics #16, published in July 1940. The Green Lantern possesses a power ring that gives him control over the physical world as long as the wielder has sufficient willpower and strength to wield it.

  • Ben
    "If a film like Daredevil teaches us anything, it is that a movie studio will only give a franchise one chance." If only that were true for The Incredible Hulk films.
  • Pete
    " The best part about it, anybody can be become one of the Green Lanterns because anyone can end up with that ring"

    Excuse me? Anyone? Hasn't he read the books? Only one who can overcome great fear and has a lot of willpower can wield a Ring.

    "To me, this was on the last great comic book movie that hasn’t been made,"

    Can't argue that, it's kinda true...

    But I'm not convinced that any of that (JLA, Flash, now GL) is going to be any good. Most possibly only if you turn off your inner geek and your brain. my 2cents...
  • Tim G.

    Berlanti is a solid writer. His extensive work as a producer could be a benefit too. I say let's give him the benefit of the doubt.

  • American Clichester
    Again, George Miller is an awesome director. I have faith in the JLA movie - I just don't think anyone can envision what he does right now and it's frustrating the blogosphere and comic fans.

    One thing is for sure, the WB must be pretty stoked on what they've seen so far from Miller to greenlight two $100mill-budgeted flicks in a week's time.

    As far as casting Bale in JLA, in case you didn't know, his contract stipulates that he had to star in a spin-off movie as Batman, so WB is probably losing money (pay or play et al) because Miller decided to go with someone else. Also, Nolan has stated that just like the comics, two Batmans should co-exist, and Bale shouldn't star in JLA. I think this is a good decision. Miller's tone is definitely going to be diff from the Dark Knight's. It'd be confusing and squelch the integrity of both films.

    I have no idea who this director for Green Lantern is, but his quotes in The Hollywood Reporter make it sound like he's going for a serious approach to the material. As stated, at least it's not the Jack Black version of Green Lantern that was almost a surething at one point.

    Also, isn't the Green Lantern in JLA of African American ethnicity? So, I'm guessing this isn't totally in line with Miller's film either. Superhero movies are growing at an exponential rate - I didn't see this happening. It would be great if there were two Batmans, and only one Bruce Wayne though.
  • KEL
    No,THE GL is NOT black,A (singular) GL is black,and his name is John Stewart,and he's one of Hal Jordan's (pictured) backup GLs,but then you were probably talking about the one they're using in JLA and probably already knew that. They'd better be using hal for this film,and not a lame-ass supporting GL like John. Hal's got sooooo much more story to him than any other GL,especially john. Besides,he's the best GL of all time. If they use John in JLA (and you know they will to be polittically correct and get a minority on the team,which is fine,just give Hal his screentime I say),they need to make it clear that there is more than one GL,and they need to at least refference Hal Jordan. Besides,the GL used in the JLA film might have minimum screentime,so it might be better ifhe went with john or someone other than Hal anyway so's not to hurt the GL film. I just hope this AND Flash come out soon,like before 2010. I hope this is good too,cuz right now,it seems like they can't do anything right with GL outside of the comics.
  • KEL
    Hopefully they'll get the batsuit right in JLA,like the comic style black and gray look,which is in reality much MORE camouflage than the all black plastic suits they've used in all the batman movies.
  • Ricky
    I am completely confident in Berlanti since I absolutely loved his TV work and the one film he did. I think this could be great. The DC universe so far has been underrepresented in film, but minus "Catwoman" it's been done right. I don't see why anyone would see this as something bad. Yes, GL hasn't been adapted and ruined for the big screen (yet), but who says it has to be bad? I say definitely give it a chance.
  • Tekjock
    Michael Jai White for GL
blog comments powered by Disqus