<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 12 to 18 3D Movies Per Year by 2010?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/10/17/12-to-18-3d-movies-per-year-by-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/10/17/12-to-18-3d-movies-per-year-by-2010/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  2 Dec 2008 22:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/10/17/12-to-18-3d-movies-per-year-by-2010/#comment-89553</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/10/17/12-to-18-3d-movies-per-year-by-2010/#comment-89553</guid>
		<description>I don't get the appeal.  Sure it's neat, but whatever.  Also, is there some new 3-D technology I'm aware of, or is this standard left-right glasses (I assume polarized, otherwise you don't even get the color)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the appeal.  Sure it&#8217;s neat, but whatever.  Also, is there some new 3-D technology I&#8217;m aware of, or is this standard left-right glasses (I assume polarized, otherwise you don&#8217;t even get the color)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
