<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ratatouille Could Have Been &#8220;Rats!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 15:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-131966</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-131966</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry I meant that to Ryan2888 not MR E. ... SORRY :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry I meant that to Ryan2888 not MR E. &#8230; SORRY :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-131965</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-131965</guid>
		<description>Ratatouille IS A MUUUCCCHH Better name... Sorry MR. E it looks like your the ONLY one who thinks Rats is a better name :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ratatouille IS A MUUUCCCHH Better name&#8230; Sorry MR. E it looks like your the ONLY one who thinks Rats is a better name :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STUDIO99</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-55459</link>
		<dc:creator>STUDIO99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-55459</guid>
		<description>lol except Cars. 

But I do agree, Ratatouille is a MUCH better name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol except Cars. </p>
<p>But I do agree, Ratatouille is a MUCH better name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. E</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-55366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-55366</guid>
		<description>I would have to disagree. Ratatouille sounds much more sophisticated, and does, in itself, represent the main character's rat origin slowly combining with his love for French delicacies. Besides, Pixar has built its foundation around originality, and such a reputation preceeds even into the TITLES of their films. When was the last time you saw a film with the same title as a Pixar animation? Never, you say? Yeah, me neither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to disagree. Ratatouille sounds much more sophisticated, and does, in itself, represent the main character&#8217;s rat origin slowly combining with his love for French delicacies. Besides, Pixar has built its foundation around originality, and such a reputation preceeds even into the TITLES of their films. When was the last time you saw a film with the same title as a Pixar animation? Never, you say? Yeah, me neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan2888</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-55105</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan2888</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/06/26/ratatouille-could-have-been-rats/#comment-55105</guid>
		<description>50 bucks says more people would be interested if it were called Rats. Ratatouille is a horrible name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>50 bucks says more people would be interested if it were called Rats. Ratatouille is a horrible name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
