Comments on: Michael Madsen says Sin City 2 Might Not Happen

By: Agent Bedhead

Agent Bedhead — Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:12:49 +0000

[...] as one would expect from a guy with a monkey on his back. According to Madsen, Sin City 2 may never hit theatres: They haven’t shot it [Sin City 2] yet. I don’t know if they ever will. I am not sure [...]

By: Aeryn

Aeryn — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:03:49 +0000

Ummm, if any of you had bothered to read the stories before you vegged out on the admittedly brilliant movie adaptation, you’d know there are quite a few more stories, not prequels per se, though some of the stories are related. Some are not. Do not just make shit up and assume you’re not an idiot. You are, trust me.

By: Brooke

Brooke — Thu, 31 May 2007 16:00:12 +0000

To my knowledge there is a lot of “Sin City” material to draw from. Apparently, the first film dealt mainly with the “ending” of the stories, while I’ve heard the sequel will actually be more of a prequel.

By: Ivanmarsh

Ivanmarsh — Thu, 31 May 2007 02:14:02 +0000

How can there be a Sin City 2… there’s no more Frank Miller content to film. Sin City was genius, it was verbatim, the content of the comics. I’m just glad to hear Madsen was smart enough to know that without Marv there is no show.

By: sweet bunny

sweet bunny — Thu, 31 May 2007 00:04:50 +0000

i liked him when he played for the lakers.

By: Tannerpwnz

Tannerpwnz — Wed, 30 May 2007 23:44:17 +0000

Good riddance. That movie was no good.

By: warplayer

warplayer — Tue, 29 May 2007 20:09:16 +0000

nah, this guy doesn’t know what he is talking about. Grindhouse was a Tarrentino-driven vehicle despite Rodriguez’s involvement. And Frank Miller’s Sin City and 300 were both very successful.

By: OAKside

OAKside — Tue, 29 May 2007 19:29:04 +0000

Madsen needs to use a little more of his brain next time. Sounds loony.