Comments on: We Predicted Spider-Man 3 Quality Issues Almost 2 Years Ago

By: gloria

gloria — Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:22:58 +0000

Harry Osborne … yesterday i found something about aladygma and osborne. i thought i had to do with cloverfield, and maybe spain. but now i realise, aladygma could also be the code name for next spiderman.

By: Rick

Rick — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:31:06 +0000

Was it me or did the actors (Maguire, Dunst, and Franco) just looked plain tired in this 3rd movie? It seemed as if they were sick or badly dehydrated during the filming. Not even make-up could cover their exhausted faces. I dont know, but that’s what it looked like to me. Also their performances seemed a bit off in retrospect to the previous 2. It just wasn’t all there at times and more like a forced scene. This 3rd installment was disappointing, but still kept pretty true to the comics which matters in the end. Cant wait for 4.

By: Dylan

Dylan — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:04:58 +0000

I loved the movie.It’s the best Spidey yet.Sam Raimi please make more Spiderman movies.

By: travis

travis — Sat, 19 May 2007 20:03:45 +0000

yall suck it was a good movie

By: Skribble

Skribble — Fri, 18 May 2007 12:50:54 +0000

I hate to say it but Spiderman 3 was utter pap! I had high hopes considering one of my favorite villans was involved (Venom) but alas it all turned out to be mindless cack! Bury Spiderman in the “ok enoughs enough” box, please dont bring him back for a fourth installment…………..

By: Raleigh

Raleigh — Sat, 12 May 2007 03:41:25 +0000

Well my son just called and told me to avoid this movie at all cost. He walked out of it and asked for his money back. Maybe others should do the same!

By: JC

JC — Fri, 11 May 2007 01:42:58 +0000

Haha I predicted the same thing TOO!! But It actually took place at a conversation by a watercooler, but alas…

…I agree, it was way overdone at times. Many themes were not explored, and the characters were one too many to say the least. This is especially felt in when we lose the ability to empathize with the Peter Parker character. It’s sad, but the thing that I missed the most was not being able to put myself in his shoes.

Apart from that we don’t spend enough time with the villains to feel the pain who made them who they are. I guess the thing that was lacking in the story was the inter-connective dynamic between the characters that made the story come to life in the previous films. Not to say that it wasn’t attempted, but the sad truth is that the attempt made was superficial at best.

Sigh… It was a good run though, and the experience I had watching the beautiful print at the IMAX will always stay with me. The vivid colors, and the scope of it all was quite an experience to say the least.

By: Dianna

Dianna — Thu, 10 May 2007 18:18:32 +0000

Waaaaaaaay to much going on in Spidey3! It was dizzying, to say the least!
The saving grace was the development/retraction of dear ole’ Harry Osborn!
He was a treat to watch! His devilish grin, his innocent hospital stay, his redemption scene at the end - It all worked! So did the basic suit with the
dagger-arms, the retractable mask & the flyboy - oops! - I mean FLYBOARD!

Peter will always be the ‘nerdy kid from Queens’ no matter how hard he may
try to ‘be cool being bad’. MJ will still never be able to sing (yes, that was her
REAL voice!), Sandman & Venom were un-neccessary villlians in this 3rd
installment (IMO) & Gwen Stacy seemed just thrown in so we wouldn’t have to
look at only MJ as the ‘woman in peril’. Topher Grace was a funny kid but I can
do without him.

I just couldn’t do without Harry!

By: Screen Rant

Screen Rant — Thu, 10 May 2007 14:45:46 +0000

I predicted the same thing almost two years ago as well:

http://screenrant.com/archives/spidey-3-too-many-villains-spo-372.html

Vic