<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hills Have Eyes 2 NOT screened for Press?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/</link>
	<description>Blogging the Reel World</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 07:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fyodor_Fish</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5145</link>
		<dc:creator>Fyodor_Fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5145</guid>
		<description>That seriously blows, man. Here I was all set to check this out next week (free, of course) and now I have to pay to see it? No way, no how. 

[/joking]

Guess I'll wait until it gets a DVD release.

p.s. You're spot on about the changing role of critics in the New Media Age(tm).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seriously blows, man. Here I was all set to check this out next week (free, of course) and now I have to pay to see it? No way, no how. </p>
<p>[/joking]</p>
<p>Guess I&#8217;ll wait until it gets a DVD release.</p>
<p>p.s. You&#8217;re spot on about the changing role of critics in the New Media Age(tm).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: culturalelite</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5089</link>
		<dc:creator>culturalelite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5089</guid>
		<description>Yeah true, thats more than possible.. it looked like a small list</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah true, thats more than possible.. it looked like a small list</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sciretta</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5088</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sciretta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5088</guid>
		<description>Is it possible that the screening you saw was for studio executives, exib or the general public? In San Francisco they are not screening it for press, although I'm pretty sure I saw a general pass at some store for a WOM screening (word of mouth).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that the screening you saw was for studio executives, exib or the general public? In San Francisco they are not screening it for press, although I&#8217;m pretty sure I saw a general pass at some store for a WOM screening (word of mouth).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: culturalelite</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5087</link>
		<dc:creator>culturalelite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5087</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... they seem to be screening it here in the UK, as I saw some peoples going to see it the other day when I was at Fox (going to a screening of Sunshine)...

weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; they seem to be screening it here in the UK, as I saw some peoples going to see it the other day when I was at Fox (going to a screening of Sunshine)&#8230;</p>
<p>weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Clicks &#187; ScreenHead</title>
		<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5079</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Clicks &#187; ScreenHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/03/13/the-hills-have-eyes-2-not-screened-for-press/#comment-5079</guid>
		<description>[...] The Hills Have Eyes 2 to be hidden from critics. Doesn&#8217;t bode well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Hills Have Eyes 2 to be hidden from critics. Doesn&#8217;t bode well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
